Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate and Laser in the Treatment of Cervical Dentin Sensitivity
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 62
- 主要终点
- Change of the Pain Sensitivity
研究概览
简要总结
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatments for dental hypersensitivity: cyanoacrylate (Super Bonder®) compared with use of low intensity laser treatment (LILT). As the cyanoacrylate is a lower cost treatment, the hypothesis in investigation is if this product is equally effective as the laser treatment.
详细描述
The present study included 62 patients (15 male and 47 females, aged 12 to 60 years). The initial cervical dentin hypersensitivity was checked throughout a thermal test (air blast). The 434 teeth included were that with a score ≥5 in a numerical scale rating of pain. Teeth were randomly assigned according quadrants (split mouth design) - 216 were allocated to LILT group and 218 for the Super Bonder® group. Thermal tests with a tetrafluoroethane spray (Endo-Ice®) and air blast were performed and considered as baseline. Pain parameters were recorded using a numerical scale rating with 24 hours, 30, 90 and 180 days after the interventions. Quality of life of the patients was also assessed with the use of OHIP-14 at baseline and after 180 days.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 12 Years 至 60 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •patients should be in good general and dental health;
- •present complaints of dental sensitivity to cold, sweet, acidic foods and brushing;
- •present complaints of pain in teeth located in different quadrants;
- •manifest pain or discomfort upon application of the triple syringe air jet;
- •not be in current use of desensitizing agents.
排除标准
- •presence of extensive restorations and carious lesions in the sensitive teeth;
- •undergoing orthodontic treatment;
- •frequent use of analgesics, antidepressants and anti-inflammatory drugs;
- •presence of gingival inflammation;
- •non-consent of patient.
结局指标
主要结局
Change of the Pain Sensitivity
时间窗: Baseline and 180 days
Change in pain experienced by the participants was calculated as the difference between baseline level of pain sensitivity and after 180 days. Pain was recorded using a numerical pain assessment scale with range between 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The higher the numbering the worse the result.
次要结局
- Quality of Life Improvement(Baseline and 180 days)
研究者
Olga Flecha
PHD student
Federal University of São Paulo