Comparison of Conventional Versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 46
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Pain severity
研究概览
简要总结
This study aimed at to fill the gaps by comparing the surgical outcomes of the conventional versus transverse mini-incision technique for carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of pain and functional outcomes.
详细描述
The study findings would be helpful in determining the superiority of one surgical technique over the other for carpal tunnel release so that a quicker return to normal activities and work for those patients could be achieved, causing less pain and scarring. Due to frequent healthcare visits, quality of life can also be improved along with a decrease in morbidity.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Any genders
- •Aged between 18 and 70 years
- •Presenting with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome for at least 3 months duration, and having a VAS score > 4.
排除标准
- •Patients with wrists with thenar atrophy
- •Those who had previous CTR surgery
- •Local injection for CTS
- •Pregnant females
- •Patients suffering from inflammatory arthropathy
- •Polyneuropathy
结局指标
主要结局
Pain severity
时间窗: 9 months
A score percentage of 0-40 on the visual analog scale was graded as good, 50-60 as fair, and 70-100 as poor
Functional outcome
时间窗: 9 months
On functional severity scale, a score percentage of 20-45% was graded as good, 46-60% was graded as fair, and 61-100% was graded as poor.
次要结局
未报告次要终点