跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06414772
NCT06414772尚未招募不适用

Evaluation of an Electronic Tool Designed to Facilitate Communication Between Allophone Patients or Patients With Communication Difficulties and Physicians in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
试验地点
3
主要终点
Quality of communication

研究概览

简要总结

In France, over 21 million people visit emergency departments every year, 10% of whom speak little or no French. The language barrier is a problem for patient safety and quality of care. Ethical and financial aspects are also affected. Unnecessary tests are more frequent, hospital stays more numerous and longer. Patient's management may be inappropriate. Patients are less satisfied, understand and adhere less to cmanagement and recommendations.

Some solutions are available to the emergency physician, but their contribution is limited. A professional interpreter is reliable and takes cultural aspects into account, but his or her cost is high and availability incompatible with emergency care. Translation by a close relative poses the problem of confidentiality. Telephone interpreting is available at any time, but is expensive and less satisfying than direct interaction. Computerized machine translation is economical and easy to access, but does not take into account all medical terms. It also poses a data protection problem. Phraselators translate predefined phrases with precision, but are time-consuming and unsophisticated.

In addition, these aids are used during the consultation. They are therefore difficult to combine and take up care time.

This care time is mainly devoted to establishing medical history essential for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions.

MARTI is a digital tool for pediatric emergency room consultations. Its aim is to enable the emergency physician to start the consultation with a medical history completed autonomously by the parents during their waiting time. Its content has been developed by emergency physicians.

Language and cultural barriers are overcome through the use of simple phrases and pictograms developed with linguists, language schools and Immigrant organizations.

MARTI was used in a pediatric emergency department. Feedback from patients and carers indicates that it is ready to be tested in real-life conditions.

This pilot study is designed to evaluate how MARTI improves communication with an allophone or a person with comprehension difficulties, according to the emergency physician in charge of the consultation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Person responsible for a child admitted to pediatric emergency.
  • Person with a language barrier.
  • Person speaking one of the 11 languages proposed by MARTI.
  • Signed informed consent indicating that the subject has understood the purpose and procedures of the study and agrees to participate in the study and to abide by the requirements and restrictions inherent in the study.
  • Affiliation with a health insurance

排除标准

  • Person who shares a common language with the physician.
  • Illiterate person.
  • Person accompanying a child with a life-threatening emergency.
  • Subject without health insurance.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Subject in the exclusion period of another study or in the "national volunteer file".

结局指标

主要结局

Quality of communication

时间窗: Day 1

The quality of communication will be assessed using a Likert-type scale to be completed by the emergency physician at the end of the consultation (whether MARTI was used or not). Originally, Likert scale is a rating scale that assesses opinions, attitudes, or behaviors quantitatively in five point expressed as follows: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree. These points have been kept for the scale of the study, which was adapted with items like "Using MARTI app reduced my anxiety" (for caregivers), "The app is easy to use" (for parents), etc.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Evaluation of an E-tool Designed to Facilitate... | 临床试验