跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04396743
NCT04396743Unknown不适用

Comparative Evaluation of Two PRF Formulations on Quality of Life and 2D and 3D Assessment of Healing Outcome of Apicomarginal Defects.

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2019年12月11日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Healing of apicomarginal defects.

研究概览

简要总结

Healing of apicomarginal defects using 2 different formulations of PRF i.e PRF -high and PRF-medium will be assessed and compared using 2D and 3D criteria. Also, in vitro evaluation of the PRF formulations and quality of life will be compared between the two groups.

详细描述

Periapical surgery is a viable treatment option in teeth with persistent apical periodontitis, especially in cases which fail to heal by non surgical treatment. Kim and Kratchman classified periradicular lesions into categories A-F. Lesions A-C are of endodontic origin without any periodontal pockets and vary with respect to the size of periapical radiolucency while D-F are combined endodontic - periodontal origin and are ranked accoding to the magnitude of periodontal breakdown. Type F defects are commonly referred to as apicomarginal defects and have worst prognosis among all. The lower success rate is attributed to the apical migration of junctional epithelium and intrusion of non osteogenic connective tissue into the periapical region.

Recently, autologous platelet concentrates have been used instead of the conventional practice of using GTR barrier membranes for treating apicomarginal defects. Till date no human study has compared platelet formulations; PRF-high ( 2700 rpm for 12minutes) and PRF-medium (1500 rpm for 14minutes) to see any difference in the bony healing and the quality of life between the two groups and no study have assessed bony healing of the periapical defect with periodontal communication with the use of CBCT.

Thus, the aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of 2 different formulations of PRF on quality of life and healing outcome of periapical defects with periodontal communications . Also, in vitro histological and immunohistochemical evaluation and comparison of the clots prepared from different centrifugation protocols will be done .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 60 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patients of age 16 years and above.
  • •Patients with no general medical contraindications for oral surgical procedures (ASA-I and ASA-II according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologist's.
  • •periapical defect with periodontal communication.
  • •Periodontal pocket >6mm with apicomarginal communication confined to buccal aspect of interproximal space or mid buccal aspect of the root.
  • •Negative response to vitality test.
  • •failed previous root canal treatment with purulent discharge or failed previous surgery or recurrent episode of purulent discharge.

排除标准

  • •Presence of buccal bone on flap elevation.
  • •Unrestorable tooth.
  • •fractured /perforated roots.
  • •pregnant females and lactating mothers

研究组 & 干预措施

Periapical surgery with placement of prf high clots

Active Comparator

Patients will undergo periapical surgery and PRF-high clot and membrane will be placed inside the bonycrypt and over the denuded root surface respectively before closure of the flap.

干预措施: Periapical surgery with use of prf-high clot and membrane (Procedure)

Periapical surgery with placement of prf medium clots

Active Comparator

Patients will undergo periapical surgery and PRF-medium clot and membrane will be placed inside the bonycrypt and over the denuded root surface respectively before closure of the flap.

干预措施: Periapical surgery with use of prf-medium clot and membrane (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Healing of apicomarginal defects.

时间窗: Baseline to 12 months

Patients will be checked clinically for absence of signs and symptoms. Radiographic 2D assessment will be done by Rud and Molven criteria as follows:- 1. Complete healing- defined by re-establishment of the lamina dura 2. Incomplete healing (scar tissue) 3. Uncertain healing 4. Unsatisfactory healing (failure). 3D healing will be assessed by modified PENN 3D criteria(Schloss et al) as- 1. Complete healing 2. Limited healing 3. Uncertain healing 4. Unsatisfactory healing.

次要结局

  • Assessment of quality of life.(Baseline to day 7 postoperatively)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验