跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05440877
NCT05440877已完成不适用

Efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) Video-based Learning for Enhancing Nursing Students' Self-efficacy in Delivering Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 26 人开始时间: 2021年3月6日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
26
试验地点
1
主要终点
Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric

研究概览

简要总结

This teaching development aims to enhance the clinical reasoning and empathy of nursing students in nursing students in smoking cessation training. The evaluation aims to assess the feasibility and efficacy of virtual reality (VR) video-based learning for enhancing self-efficacy in delivering smoking cessation intervention. The proposed study is 2-arm, waitlist-control, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) (allocation ratio 1:1), by comparing the self-efficacy and performance of clinical reasoning between nursing students who are provided VR videos of a smoker's real-life scenario and reading materials (intervention group) and those who are only provided the same reading materials (control). Individual randomization will be used. All participants will be given a group assignment and expected to complete the assignment by the end of the tutorial. The group assignment and self-administered pre- and post-learning survey will be used for the teaching outcome evaluation.

详细描述

The proposed study is 2-arm, waitlist-control, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) (allocation ratio 1:1), by comparing the self-efficacy and performance of clinical reasoning between nursing students who are provided VR videos of a smoker's real-life scenario and reading materials (intervention group) and those who are only provided the same reading materials (control). Individual randomization will be used. All participants will be given a group assignment and expected to complete the assignment by the end of the tutorial. The group assignment and self-administered pre- and post-learning survey will be used for the teaching outcome evaluation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Individual randomization by serially numbered opaque sealed envelope (SNOSE) will be used to ensure the allocation sequence was concealed from both course teacher and participants before the group allocation. he participants will know the trial group and discussion group allocation by opening an envelop after they submit the consent form. All pre-post questionnaires are anonymous. All participants will be concealed of group allocation before consent, but they will not be blinded of the intervention. Two specialists in smoking cessation who will mark the group assignment will be blinded to group allocation of all participants.

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The study targets to recruit candidates of Master of Nursing who are taking the course "Tobacco Dependency Nursing Intervention and Management (NURS8205)" (n=65). All candidates are registered nurses.

排除标准

  • Students who cannot understand Cantonese will be excluded from the trial.

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention group

Experimental

Provided with a tutorial guide, and VR-based teaching materials in the tutorial session

干预措施: VR materials (Behavioral)

Intervention group

Experimental

Provided with a tutorial guide, and VR-based teaching materials in the tutorial session

干预措施: Tutorial guide (Behavioral)

Control group

Experimental

Provided with the tutorial guide in the tutorial session.

干预措施: Tutorial guide (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric

时间窗: After the tutorial (at 1-day)

(1) Effective noticing: Focused observation; (2) Effective noticing: Recognizing deviations from expected patterns; (3) Effective noticing: Information seeking; (4) Effective interpreting: Prioritizing data; (5) Effective interpreting: Making sense of data; (6) Effective responding: Well-planned intervention/flexibility; (7) Effective responding: Being skilful; (8) Effective reflecting: Evaluation/self-analysis. Each item can be scored from exemplary, accomplished, developing and beginning.

Self-efficacy in delivering smoking cessation intervention

时间窗: Before and after the tutorial (at 1-day)

(1) Understand the quitting barriers of smokers barriers; (2) Design quit plan for smoking patients; (3) Prioritize interventions for smoking patients; (4) Educate smoking patients on essential tasks; (5) Overall confidence in the management of smoking patients; and (6) Overall competence in the management of smoking patients. Each item can be scored from 0 (not at all competent) to 10 (extremely competent).

Empathy in delivering smoking cessation intervention

时间窗: Before and after the tutorial (at 1-day)

(1) Show empathy to smoking patients; (2) Show care to smoking patients; (3) Being positive; (4) See things from smokers' perspective; (5) Can you show tender feeling for smokers? (0: Not at all, 5: half and half, 10: extremely); (6) Do you feel sorry for smokers who are unable to quit? (0: Not sorry at all, 5: half and half, 10: extremely sorry); (7) Do you feel sorry for smokers who do not want to quit? (0: Not sorry at all, 5: half and half, 10: extremely sorry); and (8) Do you feel annoyed if smokers ignore your cessation advice (0: Not annoyed at all, 5: half and half, 10: extremely annoyed). Each item can be scored from 0 (not at all competent) to 10 (extremely competent).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验