跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04710953
NCT04710953Unknown不适用

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Hyperbaric Chamber Ventilation for the Patients of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) When Given in Addition to Standard of care-a Randomized Control Trial

sultan mehmood kamran0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2021年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
30
主要终点
Resolution of HAPE

研究概览

简要总结

High altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is mostly treated with supplemental oxygen, nifedipine 30mg twice a day, rest, limiting cold exposure and descent (simulated or actual) Gamow Bag provides simulated descent and buy time for actual descent. CPAP is claimed to be effective in many case reports to treat HAPE temporarily until actual descent is taken place. This study aims to evaluate the role of CPAP in treating HAPE at those high altitude stations where Gamow bag is not available and immediate descent is not possible.

详细描述

Background:

Swenson described HAPE in 2002, as a form of hydrostatic acute pulmonary edema with an alteration of alveolar-capillary permeability. Overall prevalence of AMS is 10-20% while incidence of HAPE, HACE or mixed incidence is 2-3%. Highest reported incidence of HAPE among Indian soldiers climbing to Siachen glacier is 15.5%. At 1500-2400m, A series of 52 patients admitted for HAPE over a period of 9 years was reported in literature..

Scientific rationale:

Positive pressure has been used to increase altitude tolerance since the 1940s under simulated altitudes. PEEP applied via face mask increased SpO2 and decreased AMS symptoms. CPAP was used after ascent to 3205 m on Mount Cook in New Zealand where it improved SpO2 and reduced symptoms of HAPE. A CPAP helmet providing 15 cmH20 CPAP improved SpO2 in a single HAPE patient (at 5300 m) from 56% to 74%.-1st case report. A study at Thorang La pass (5416 m) in October 2010 in the Nepal Himalaya found that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is useful as an additional modality to treat presumed high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE)- 2nd case report.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Male gender
  • •Age 18-45 years
  • •Previously fit and no comorbids
  • •Suspected HAPE
  • •-arrived in the past 01 week on the post
  • •Expected evacuation from post more than 8 hours

排除标准

  • •Symptoms suggest acute infective etiology.
  • •Symptoms after one week of stay at HA
  • •Altered mental status.
  • •Disturbed balance
  • •Visual impairment
  • •Severe headache
  • •A speedy evacuation to a lower height is available

研究组 & 干预措施

CPAP arm

Experimental

In addition to standard of care, CPAP will be provided at high altitude posts where Gamow bag is not available and all patients of HAPE will be given CPAP when evacuation/descent is either not possible or delayed due to weather conditions.

干预措施: Continuous positive airway pressure machine (Device)

Gamow bag arm/hyperbaric chamber

No Intervention

Posts where Gamow bag would be available, the patients of HAPE will be given standard of care and will be asked to lie inside Gamow bag inflated at 2 Psi for several hours to simulate a descent of 1500 meters when evacuation/descent is either not possible or delayed due to weather conditions.

结局指标

主要结局

Resolution of HAPE

时间窗: 8 hours

No dyspnea at rest, 2. RR \< 20 3. Pulse \< 100 4. O2 sat \> 90% 5. Chest clears to auscultation Pulse \< 100 O2 sat \> 90% CheComplete resolution of HAPE symptoms RR \< 20 Pulse \< 100 O2 sat \> 90% Chest clear to auscultation complete resolution of HAPE symptoms with RR \< 20, Pulse \< 100, O2 saturation \> 92% and chest clear to auscultation

次要结局

  • Partial improvement in HAPE features(8 hours)

研究者

发起方
sultan mehmood kamran
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

sultan mehmood kamran

Classified Medical specialist

UNICEF

相似试验

Comparison of CPAP and Gamow Bag Ventilation to... | 临床试验