Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02478437
NCT02478437CompletedPhase 3

A Prospective Trial of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome

Northwestern University2 sites in 1 country48 target enrollmentStarted: June 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
48
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Pain improvement

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is being done to determine whether cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) on the medial branch nerves of the lumbar facet joint is effective for the treatment of low back pain. CRFA blocks the nerves that carry pain signals from joints in the lower back such that the brain does not receive the message that the low back is in pain. This technique is commonly performed by burning these nerves rather freezing them, but it is suspected that freezing them results in better pain relief. The CRFA blocks has been shown to effectively treat sacroiliac joint pain (a joint in the pelvis), which is another reason that it is suspected that CRFA will be effective when treating pain related to facet joints in the low back. We are performing this study in order to determine if that is the case.

Detailed Description

The CRFA blocks has been shown to effectively treat sacroiliac joint pain (a joint in the pelvis), which is another reason that it is suspected that CRFA will be effective when treating pain related to facet joints in the low back. We are performing this study in order to determine if that is the case.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 79 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with lumbar facet syndrome pain who would undergo treatment by lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.
  • Low back pain for at least 6 months.
  • Pain resistant to conventional therapy including NSAIDs, opioids, muscle relaxants, oral steroids, physical therapy or chiropractic care.
  • Pain diagram suggesting possibility of facet-mediated pain.
  • Referred pain when present not beyond the knee.
  • Positive response to at least 1 set of diagnostic intra-articular facet injections or medial branch blocks, defined as > 75% reduction in pain following diagnostic blocks with local anesthetic (0.5mL of 0.5% bupivacaine OR 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
  • Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement related to spinal stenosis.
  • Previous radiofrequency ablation treatment for similar symptoms.
  • Patient refusal.
  • Lack of consent.
  • Active systemic or local infections at the site of proposed needle and electrode placement.
  • Coagulopathy or other bleeding disorder, current use of anticoagulants or anti-platelet medications.
  • Allergy to medications being used for injection procedures (contrast dye, local anesthetic, IV sedative).
  • Inability to read English, communicate with staff, or participate in follow up.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Cognitive deficit.
  • Negative response to diagnostic intra-articular facet injections or medial branch blocks, defined as < 75% reduction in pain following diagnostic blocks with local anesthetic (0.5mL of 0.5% bupivacaine OR 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine).
  • Daily opiate analgesic use more exceeding 3 months prior to study inclusion.
  • Unstable medical or psychiatric illness.

Arms & Interventions

Group 1

Active Comparator

Conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) Following ablation, 0.5 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected to provide post procedure analgesia.

Intervention: Conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (Procedure)

Group 2

Active Comparator

Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) Following ablation, 0.5 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected to provide post procedure analgesia.

Intervention: Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain improvement

Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure

Percent of participants who reported 50% or greater improvement in pain

Secondary Outcomes

  • Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression short form index (CESD-10)(1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure)
  • Global pain score(1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure)
  • McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)(1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure)
  • Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale short form (PASS-20)(1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

David Walega

Associate Professor, Chief, Division of Pain Medicine

Northwestern University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials