Evolution of Robotic Cholecystectomy; the U.C. Davis Experience.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 200
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Comparing hernia rates between multi-port verses single port approaches.
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Comparing the use of surgical robotics during a Cholecystectomy, comparing different platforms and approaches (multi port verses single port).
Detailed Description
This study is a restrospective review of charts, including operating room notes as well as operating room documentation of procedures. Currently there are numerous methods considered to be the Standard of Care in the surgical treatment of Cholecystitis, or Cholelithiasis, including Open Surgery, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. This study retrospectively reviews the intraoperative and post operative clinical outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Surgery at U.C. Davis Medical Center to: 1) establish the role of robotics in laparoscopic surgery, and 2) to assess the learning curve by surgeons.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Other
- Time Perspective
- Retrospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients that have undergone robotic assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients under the age of 18, or not choosing to have surgery.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Comparing hernia rates between multi-port verses single port approaches.
Time Frame: June 2004 through May 2015
Comparing multi port and single port approaches. Patients will be followed up under the standard of care model, normal clinical follow-ups required post surgery (10 Days to 2 weeks post operative) with additional clinical visits as required to monitor post operative complications (if any).
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported