Experiencing the Risks of Overutilizing Opioids Among Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain in Ambulant Care
- Conditions
- R52.1M54.9Chronic intractable painDorsalgia, unspecified
- Registration Number
- DRKS00020358
- Lead Sponsor
- Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung/Center for Adaptive Rationality
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1241
A. Study population for testing the comprehensibility of questionnaires and study materials (comprehension pilot) (N = 40):
A1. Patients with chronic (=3 month) noncancer pain: n = 20
A2. Family physicians licensed for narcotic prescriptions (BtM) and physicians specialized in special pain therapy: n = 10
A3. Pharmacists licensed for narcotic substances: n = 10
Data from this comprehension pilot is not evaluated in a confirmatory manner.
B. Study population for the RCT (N = 1.200):
B1. Family physicians licensed for narcotic prescriptions (BtM): n = 300
B2. Physicians specialized in Special pain management: n = 300
B3. Patients with chronic (=3 month) noncancer pain: n = 300
B4. Pharmacists licensed for narcotic substances: n = 300
All four study populations will be examined with an identical methodological design (pre-/post-intervention online survey).
Study population 1:
Family physicians NOT licensed for prescribing narcotic substances
Study population 2:
Physicians NOT specialized in Special pain management
Study population 3:
- Patients with tumor-related chronic pain
- Patients with chronic noncancer pain = 3 months
Study population 4:
Pharmacists NOT licensed for narcotic substances such as opioids
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method (i) Objective risk perception; (ii) subjective risk perception; (iii) risk behavior (physicians' prescription behavior; patients' intake behavior; pharmacists counseling behavior)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method (i) differences in risk perception and behavior as a function of how a person learnt about the risks;<br>(ii) differences in risk perception and behavior as a function of an individual’s medical risk literacy; (iii) concordance between actual risk behavior reported at 9-months follow-up and intended change in risk behavior reported immediately after the intervention