Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07227116
NCT07227116RecruitingNot Applicable

ESCALATE: Evaluating the Status of Complex Aneuploidy to Locate Additional Transferrable Embryos

Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center4 sites in 2 countries280 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2025Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
280
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Reproducibility

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the reproductive potential of embryos classified as "complex aneuploid" (involving three or more abnormal chromosomes) or "chaotic" (six or more abnormal chromosomes) through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Specifically, we seek to determine whether embryos initially reported as having multiple chromosomal abnormalities might still have the potential for normal chromosomal composition, the opportunity for transfer, and ultimately, the potential to achieve a live birth through re-biopsy and reanalysis.

Key Information:

This portion of the study seeks your consent for the re-biopsy and genetic reanalysis of the embryos only. It does not yet include consent for potential future transfer.

Participation remains completely voluntary, and your decision will not affect your current or future care.

We deeply appreciate your support and commitment to advancing fertility research.

Detailed Description

Recently, the term "chaotic" has come into the PGT-A reporting lexicon, defined (perhaps arbitrarily) as 6 or more aneuploidies detected. Complex aneuploidy refers to embryos with multiple chromosomal aneuploidies. In one large study, complex aneuploidy at the cleavage stage was found in 41% of embryos overall, 29% of embryos in women 27-37 years old, and 45% of embryos in women 38-45 years old. By the blastocyst stage, only 10% of all embryos were complex aneuploid, with 13.7% of embryos in women aged 38-47 years compared to 4.5% in women aged 27-37 years demonstrating complex aneuploidy. Multiple aneuploidies were also detected in a retrospective study of 1502 spontaneous abortions, with 4.6% of cases showing double aneuploidy and only 0.4% showing 3 or more aneuploidies (2).

The high rate of complex aneuploidy in cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos even among young patients suggests multiple mitotic errors in the first few cell divisions, which would likely lead to developmental arrest (2). Therefore, if transferred, such embryos would be expected not to implant or to miscarry. Historically, embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities have therefore been de-selected for transfer or even discarded. However, recently Lin et al. reported a healthy live birth following chaotic embryo transfer (3), calling into question the assumed non-viability of chaotic embryos. Might some of these embryos correct multiple aneuploidies and become euploid? It is plausible that any euploid population of cells could have a higher survival rate and a higher mitotic rate, and if abnormal cells undergo apoptosis, a euploid embryo could result. This could explain the low rate of complex aneuploidy seen in miscarriages. An additional explanation is that imperfections in the biopsy, amplification, and/or NGS PGT-A process occasionally lead to noisy reads, that are interpreted as multiple chromosomal abnormalities, but actually reflect artifact. For such embryos, re- testing may result in euploid results.

Small studies (published in abstract form only) have evaluated the reproducibility of chaotic results from NGS-based PGT-A. A retrospective cohort study evaluated 58 'chaotic' embryos via PGT-A of re-biopsy samples. Thirty-eight percent (n=22) of embryos had euploid re-biopsy results (4). Our group reported re-biopsy of 64 embryos initially classified as chaotic and identified 17% (n=11) of embryos in the cohort as euploid and only 67% concordance between initial and re-biopsy sample results (5). Four blastocysts with euploid results on re- biopsy were transferred, resulting in two ongoing pregnancies. Furthermore, we have pooled data from multiple IVF clinics within our network that have conducted re-biopsy of embryos with multiple aneuploidies and found that overall, 22% had euploid PGT-A results on re-biopsy (Background Table, unpublished data).

In anticipation of conducting a prospective observational study to characterize the nature of PGT-A results indicating 3 or more aneuploidies, we have begun to catalog and hold these embryos in storage. To date, 112 patients with have explicitly expressed interest in contributing 128 embryos resulted as 'chaotic' or 'complex aneuploid' of 3-5 chromosomes, for the purposes of this research, and we anticipate identifying multiples of this number upon a

retrospective database search and with prospective accumulation of additional PGT-A results. Following a retrospective database search, we have identified a total of 274 'chaotic' and 5251 'complex aneuploid' embryos having been reported using NGS based PGT-A. Limited data exist on the reproductive potential of embryos classified as having multiple chromosomal abnormalities, and preliminary data, including from our center, suggest a high false positive rate. The large volume of ART performed within our network represents a unique opportunity to characterize the clinical significance of these results, in the hopes of minimizing embryo wastage and maximizing live birth from IVF cycles using PGT-A.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Having ≥ 1 embryo classified as whole chromosome chaotic or complex aneuploid of 3 or more chromosomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using an NGS based platform Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Embryos not meeting complex/chaotic criteria Patients declining consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Reproducibility

Time Frame: one year

To evaluate embryos with 3 or more chromosomes deemed aneuploid with NGS-based PGT-A by performing repeat biopsy and analyzing with NGS.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Benjamin Harris

MD

Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Estudio de fase IV, multicéntrico, aleatorizado y doble ciego para comparar la seguridad y eficacia de 180 µg de Pegasys® más 1000 ó 1200 mg de Copegus® con la combinación actualmente aprobada de 180 µg de Pegasys® más 800 mg de Copegus® en pacientes con infección por el virus de la hepatitis C crónica del genotipo 1 coinfectados con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH-1), que no hayan sido previamente tratados con interferón.
EUCTR2005-005506-23-ESF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd400
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Estudio fase II, multicéntrico, para evaluar los marcadores predictores de respuesta en cáncerde mama localmente avanzado, tratado con bevacizumab en combinación con quimioterapianeoadyuvante.Cancer Mama localmente avanzadoMedDRA version: 9Level: LLTClassification code 10006187Term: Breast cancer
EUCTR2009-011037-27-ESInstituto Científico Tecnológico de Navarra (ICTN)75
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
An open, phase IV, multicentre, study to assess the long-term persistence of antibodies against hepatitis B and the immune response to a hepatitis B vaccine challenge in healthy children aged 11-12 years, previously vaccinated with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals’ DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (Infanrix hexa™) or GSK Biologicals’ DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV (Engerix™- B) vaccines at the ages of 3, 5 and 11 months in clinical trial DTPa-HBV-IPV-031 (217744/031). - DTPa-HBV-IPV-126 BST:031Antibody persistence and hepatitis B vaccine challenge at 11-12 years of age (excluding 13th birthday), after primary vaccination with GSK Biologicals’ DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (Infanrix hexa) or GSK Biologicals’ HBV vaccine (Engerix-B) given at the ages of 3, 5 and 11 months.
EUCTR2009-016911-39-SKGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Estudio multicéntrico, aleatorizado y fase II para valorar la seguridad y posibilidad de resección en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas inicialmente no resecables secundarias a cáncer colorrectal contratamiento de primera línea con mFOLFOX-6 más bevacizumab o FOLFOXIRI más bevazizumab.A multicentre randomized phase II study to assess the safety and resectability in patients with primarily unresectable liver metastases secondary to colorectal cancer receiving 1st line treatment either with mFOLFOX-6 plus bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab.
EUCTR2007-007863-26-ESF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd80
Withdrawn
Phase 2
Cellular Immunotherapy in Recipients of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Mismatched, Living Donor Kidney TransplantsKidney Transplant Rejection
NCT03605654Medeor Therapeutics, Inc.