Comparison of VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE with 2.4 Inches Screen V/S VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE with 24 Inches Screen on Interfacial Distance.

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Measurement and Monitoring,

• Registration Number: CTRI/2021/06/034071
• Lead Sponsor: Northern Railway Central Hospital

Brief Summary

Endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure. It is done when patient is critically ill and also at the time of General Anaesthesia before surgery. Endotracheal intubation is a potentially Aerosol generating procedure. Endotracheal Intubation is a risky procedure and carry a risk of transmission of diseases to the health care provider. Risk of infection transmission can be reduced if distance between patient and Intubator is more. VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE is helpful in this regard as distance between Intubator and patient is more with VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE in comparison to conventional Laryngoscope.

In our observation trial study, we are comparing VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE having 2.4 inches screen and VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE connected to 24 inches screen and want to know whether there is any difference in interfacial distance at the time of ET intubation while using VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE having 2.4 inches screen Vs VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE connected to 24 inches screen.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-01-07
• Last Update Posted: 2021-06-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients Having Age Between 20-70 Years.
• Patients Belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I/II/III.
• Patients Planned to undergo surgery under General Anaesthesia (Elective Surgical Procedures) with Tracheal Intubation.
• Patients Having Mallampati Grade 1/2/3.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients who underwent General Anaesthesia (G.A) in the past seven days.
• Patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status IV.
• Obese Patients with B.M.I More than 35Kg/Meter Sq. 4.
• Pregnant Patients 5.
• Emergency Operations 6.
• Patients Not Able to give consent.
• Patients having unstable Cervical Spine 8.
• Patients who are suspected/Confirmed cases of COVID-19.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To Compare the Interfacial Distance between Patients AND Anaesthesiologists at the time of Endotracheal Intubation while using VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE having 2.4 Inches Screen V/S VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE Connected to 24 Inches Screen.	At the time of Endotracheal Intubation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To Know the ease of intubation with both techniques in terms of	1. Success Rate (Success rate will be defined as no. of successful E.T Intubation divided by total number of intubation and multiplied by 100).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Northern Railway Central Hospital; 🇮🇳 Central, DELHI, India

Northern Railway Central Hospital

🇮🇳Central, DELHI, India

Dr Rakesh Kumar

Principal investigator

9717630521

rakeshkmr369b@gmail.com