In this study we will be Comparing Video Laryngoscope And Macintosh Laryngoscope For Elective Tracheal Intubation In Infants and then comparing time taken for intubation as primary objective and various other secondary objectives
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: P298- Other cardiovascular disorders originating in the perinatal periodHealth Condition 2: P84- Other problems with newbornHealth Condition 3: P768- Other specified intestinal obstruction of newborn
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/07/044293
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Attached Hospitals Jaipur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patients of either sex.
2.Age group of less than 1 years.
3.ASA grade I & II.
4.Undergoing elective pediatric surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Lack of consent by parents/guardian.
2.History of difficult intubation.
3.Children with airway related conditions such as trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass.
4.Risk of gastric aspiration.
5.Children with upper respiratory tract infection
6.If more than 3 attempts taken to intubate than exclude the particular patient.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the Time taken for intubation in both the groupsTimepoint: Maximum within 3 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.First attempt intubation success rate. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: within 1 minute of intubation;To compare Complication rate in both the groupsTimepoint: within 1 minute of intubation;To determine Ease of intubation score in both the groupsTimepoint: within 1 minute of intubation;To determine Intubation difficult score in both the groupsTimepoint: within 1 miniute of intubation