跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02663011
NCT02663011已完成不适用

Language Error Type Evaluation in Developmental Delay Preschool Children by PLS-C

Taipei Medical University Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 54 人开始时间: 2015年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
54
主要终点
What's the difference of language error types between boy and girl.

研究概览

简要总结

Purpose:

To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.

Methods:

This is a retrospective chart study enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal. Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded. We recorded correct percentage in pragmatics, syntax, and semantics in different age group separately in auditory comprehension, language expression as well as overall performance. All wrong questions answered in PLS-C were recorded. We used SAS 9.4 (Anova, t-test) to analyze the results in age differences, gender differences, and language components differences

Results:

In overall performance, expression, and comprehension, there was no difference between boy and girl by t-test in all ages. By one-way Anova Bonferroni t test, age 5 was better than age 4 and age 3 significantly in pragmatics, syntax and semantics (p<0.005).

We further separated into groups of 5YR boy, 5YR girl, 4YR boy, 4YR girl, and 3YR boy.

In overall performance, by Duncan's multiple analysis, only 5 YR boy had significant better performance than 4 YR girl and 3 YR boy in pragmatics. In age 5, boys had better performance in pragmatics than girls (p<0.05). In age 4, no differences are showed between boy and girl.

In comprehension, in age 5, boys have better performance in pragmatics than girls(p<0.05).

In expression, there was no difference between boys and girls. Pragmatics was better than syntax (p=0.0202<o.o5) in age 5.

Conclusion:

We found age had more effect than gender in language delay children. Age 5 boys had better performance in pragmatics conflicted with some previous studies and may need more exploration in the future.

Key words:

Development Delay, Preschool aged children, Language Development Delay, Semantics, Syntax, Pragmatics, Language error type

详细描述

Purpose:

To assess age and gender effect in the language error type (semantics, syntax and pragmatics)of developmental delay preschool aged children, a standardize tool "Preschool Language Scale Corrected edition(PLS-C), Lin" was adopted for evaluation.

Methods:

This is a retrospective chart study enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal. Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded. We recorded correct percentage in pragmatics, syntax, and semantics in different age group separately in auditory comprehension, language expression as well as overall performance. All wrong questions answered in PLS-C were recorded. We used SAS 9.4 (Anova, t-test) to analyze the results in age differences, gender differences, and language components differences

Results:

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
3 Years 至 5 Years(Child)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Enrolled 55 children aged 3, 4 and 5 in department of rehabilitation in Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec whose average PLS-C score was at least 1.5 SD below normal.

排除标准

  • •Those normal or PLS-C score was less than 1.5SD below normal were excluded.

结局指标

主要结局

What's the difference of language error types between boy and girl.

时间窗: 2011 Jan to 2014 Dec

In overall performance, expression, and comprehension, there was no difference between boy and girl by t-test in all ages.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Language Error Type Evaluation in Developmental... | 临床试验