MedPath

Omadacycline vs Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of CABP (EudraCT #2013-004071-13)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Community-Acquired Infections
Bacterial Pneumonia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02531438
Lead Sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
774
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients, ages 18 years or older who have signed the informed consent
  • Has qualifying bacterial pneumonia
  • Female patients must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic
  • Has received an investigational drug within past 30 days
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MoxifloxacinMoxifloxacinMoxifloxacin IV; Moxifloxacin tablets
OmadacyclineOmadacyclineOmadacycline IV; Omadacycline tablets
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseScreening; 72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test article

Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2 CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in the other CABP symptoms. Response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in CABP symptoms, worsening of any CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event, or death.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitScreening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.

Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationScreening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit.

Trial Locations

Locations (140)

Site 481

🇵🇪

Lima, Peru

Site 411

🇨🇿

Praha 10, Czechia

Site 303

🇧🇬

Pernik, Bulgaria

Site 306

🇧🇬

Sliven, Bulgaria

Site 390

🇬🇪

Tbilisi, Georgia

Site 410

🇨🇿

Praha 5, Czechia

Site 274

🇧🇷

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil

Site 506

🇺🇸

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site 508

🇺🇸

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site 512

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Site 505

🇺🇸

Ventura, California, United States

Site 503

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site 501

🇺🇸

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site 514

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site 321

🇱🇻

Riga, Latvia

Site 520

🇺🇸

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site 509

🇺🇸

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site 279

🇧🇷

São José Do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site 207

🇬🇷

Athens, Attika, Greece

Site 513

🇺🇸

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site 220

🇧🇪

Liege, Belgium

Site 393

🇬🇪

Tbilisi, Georgia

Site 210

🇬🇷

Athens, Greece

Site 412

🇨🇿

Kyjov, Czechia

Site 414

🇨🇿

Trebic, Czechia

Site 320

🇱🇻

Riga, Latvia

Site 292

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Site 294

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Site 276

🇧🇷

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site 277

🇧🇷

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil

Site 391

🇬🇪

Tbilisi, Georgia

Site 212

🇭🇷

Zadar, Croatia

Site 201

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

Site 202

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

Site 251

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

Site 405

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

Site 415

🇩🇪

Heidelberg, Germany

Site 416

🇩🇪

Jena, Germany

Site 417

🇩🇪

Paderborn, Germany

Site 208

🇬🇷

Thessaloniki, Greece

Site 310

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Site 316

🇭🇺

Miskolc, Hungary

Site 315

🇭🇺

Szekesfehervar, Hungary

Site 213

🇮🇱

Holon, Israel

Site 217

🇮🇱

Petach-Tikwa, Israel

Site 214

🇮🇱

Nazareth, Israel

Site 293

🇰🇷

Daegu, Korea, Republic of

Site 291

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Site 227

🇲🇽

Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico

Site 230

🇲🇽

Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

Site 234

🇵🇪

Cusco, Peru

Site 236

🇵🇪

Lima, Peru

Site 238

🇵🇪

Lima, Peru

Site 239

🇵🇪

Lima, Peru

Site 237

🇵🇪

Trujillo, Peru

Site 555

🇵🇭

Caloocan City, Philippines

554

🇵🇭

Manila City, Philippines

Site 553

🇵🇭

Quezon City, Philippines

Site 334

🇵🇱

Leczna, Poland

Site 331

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Site 340

🇷🇴

Bucharest, Romania

Site 342

🇷🇴

Bucharest, Romania

Site 343

🇷🇴

Bucharest, Romania

Site 345

🇷🇴

Craiova, Romania

352

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Site 350

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Site 351

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Site 353

🇷🇺

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Site 355

🇷🇺

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Site 359

🇷🇺

Zelenograd, Russian Federation

Site 431

🇸🇰

Bratislava, Slovakia

Site 430

🇸🇰

Levice, Slovakia

Site 432

🇸🇰

Martin, Slovakia

Site 433

🇸🇰

Nitra, Slovakia

Site 241

🇿🇦

Benoni, Gauteng, South Africa

Site 436

🇿🇦

Centurion, Gauteng, South Africa

Site 242

🇿🇦

Pretoria, Guateng, South Africa

Site 244

🇿🇦

Thabazimbi, Limpopo, South Africa

Site 245

🇿🇦

Middelburg, Mpumalanga, South Africa

Site 225

🇪🇸

Elche, Alicante, Spain

Site 221

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site 440

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site 224

🇪🇸

Alcira, Valencia, Spain

Site 226

🇪🇸

Alicante, Spain

Site 299

🇨🇳

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Site 297

🇨🇳

Tainan, Taiwan

Site 295

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Site 296

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Site 247

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Site 248

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Site 249

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Site 380

🇺🇦

Dnipropetrovs'k, Ukraine

Site 246

🇹🇷

Trabzon, Turkey

Site 370

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Site 375

🇺🇦

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Site 372

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Site 378

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Site 376

🇺🇦

Zaporizhia, Ukraine

Site 301

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

Site 323

🇱🇻

Liepaja, Latvia

Site 311

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Site 304

🇧🇬

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Site 392

🇬🇪

T'bilisi, Georgia

Site 516

🇺🇸

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site 511

🇺🇸

Zachary, Louisiana, United States

Site 302

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

Site 250

🇭🇷

Požega, Croatia

Site 203

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

Site 305

🇧🇬

Kyustendil, Bulgaria

Site 307

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

Site 314

🇭🇺

Debrecen, Hungary

Site 313

🇭🇺

Nyíregyháza, Hungary

Site 205

🇭🇷

Slavonski Brod, Croatia

Site 394

🇬🇪

Tbilisi, Georgia

Site 228

🇲🇽

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site 420

🇬🇷

Athens, Attika, Greece

Site 215

🇮🇱

Ramat-Gan, Israel

Site 312

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Site 421

🇬🇷

Athens, Greece

552

🇵🇭

Iloilo City, Philippines

Site 333

🇵🇱

Katowice, Poland

Site 330

🇵🇱

Łódź, Poland

Site 216

🇮🇱

Safed, Israel

Site 322

🇱🇻

Daugavpils, Latvia

Site 471

🇲🇽

Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico

Site 472

🇲🇽

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site 233

🇵🇪

Lima, Peru

Site 551

🇵🇭

Quezon City, Philippines

Site 374

🇺🇦

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Site 356

🇷🇺

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

357

🇷🇺

Sestroretsk, Russian Federation

Site 332

🇵🇱

Chrzanow, Poland

Site 354

🇷🇺

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Site 341

🇷🇴

Timisoara, Romania

Site 344

🇷🇴

Brasov, Romania

Site 358

🇷🇺

Vsevolozhsk, Russian Federation

Site 437

🇿🇦

Somerset West, Western Cape, South Africa

Site 298

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

Site 379

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Site 373

🇺🇦

Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath