Omadacycline vs. Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
- Conditions
- Community-acquired PneumoniaBacterial Pneumonia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04779242
- Lead Sponsor
- Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 670
- Male or female subjects, age 18 or older who have signed the informed consent form
- Must have a qualifying community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
- Subjects must not be pregnant or nursing at the time of enrollment
- Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug
- Known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia
- Confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Evidence of significant immunological disease
- Has a life expectancy of less than or equal to 3 months or any concomitant condition that is likely to interfere with evaluation of the response of the infection under study, determination of AEs, or completion of the expected course of treatment
- Has a history of contraindications, hypersensitivity, or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or fluoroquinolone antibiotic
- Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin 400 mg IV; Moxifloxacin 400 mg tablets; QD Dosing; 7-10 day duration Omadacycline Omadacycline Omadacycline 100 mg IV; Omadacycline 300 mg PO (2 x 150 mg tablets); QD Dosing; 7-10 day duration.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Early Clinical Response at the Early Clinical Response (ECR) Visit 72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test article Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in CABP symptoms. Response is determined programmatically using investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in 2CABP symptoms, worsening of CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event requiring alternative antibacterial treatment, or death
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit 5 to 10 days after the last dose of test article At the PTE Visit, the investigator indicates one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.
Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) Population at the PTE Visit 5 to 10 days after the last dose of test article At the PTE Visit, the investigator indicates one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.
Trial Locations
- Locations (55)
Site 803
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºDebrecen, Hungary
Site 212
🇧🇬Vidin, Bulgaria
Site 206
🇧🇬Ruse, Bulgaria
Site 407
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 901
🇵🇱Chrzanow, Poland
Site 210
🇧🇬Gabrovo, Bulgaria
Site 211
🇧🇬Vratsa, Bulgaria
Site 302
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡·Split, Croatia
Site 304
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡·Zagreb, Croatia
Site 303
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡·Zagreb, Croatia
Site 401
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 406
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 608
🇺🇦Zaporizhia, Ukraine
Site 201
🇧🇬Pleven, Bulgaria
Site 402
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 403
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 405
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 804
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºKistarcsa, Hungary
Site 509
🇷🇺Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Site 703
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
Site 705
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
Site 707
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
Site 701
🇷🇸Kragujevac, Serbia
Site 706
🇷🇸Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
Site 606
🇺🇦Dnipro, Ukraine
Site 604
🇺🇦Kharkiv, Ukraine
Site 506
🇷🇺Moscow, Russian Federation
Site 204
🇧🇬Sofia, Bulgaria
Site 404
🇬🇪Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 805
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºTorokbalint, Hungary
Site 602
🇺🇦Kharkiv, Ukraine
Site 607
🇺🇦Kyiv, Ukraine
Site 801
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºBudapest, Hungary
Site 208
🇧🇬Pernik, Bulgaria
Site 202
🇧🇬Sofia, Bulgaria
Site 205
🇧🇬Sofia, Bulgaria
Site 209
🇧🇬Sofia, Bulgaria
Site 904
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Site 902
🇵🇱Oswiecim, Poland
Site 507
🇷🇺Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Site 508
🇷🇺Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Site 704
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
Site708
🇷🇸Belgrade, Serbia
Site 702
🇷🇸Niš, Serbia
Site 611
🇺🇦Kharkiv, Ukraine
Site 603
🇺🇦Kyiv, Ukraine
Site 605
🇺🇦Kyiv, Ukraine
Site 610
🇺🇦Zaporizhia, Ukraine
Site 510
🇷🇺Moscow, Russian Federation
Site 903
🇵🇱Leczna, Poland
Site 609
🇺🇦Kyiv, Ukraine
Site 213
🇧🇬Lom, Bulgaria
Site 207
🇧🇬Sliven, Bulgaria
Site 301
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡·Zagreb, Croatia
Site 802
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºBalassagyarmat, Hungary