Optimal Treatment Strategy Based on Prognostic Groups for Pediatric de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Cytarabine
- Conditions
- Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 350
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- Rate of event free survival
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to optimize therapy according to the known risk factors and treatment response in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Detailed Description
I. Risk group assessment Favorable prognosis group: Low risk features + Good response Intermediate prognosis group: 1. Low risk features + Delayed response-1 2. Standard risk features + Good response 3. Standard risk features + Delayed response-1 Poor prognosis group: 1. Any high risk features irrespective of treatment response 2. Any delayed response-2 irrespective of risk features 3. Any refractory state irrespective of risk features 4. Any early relapse II. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide III. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients who were newly diagnosed with de novo AML
- •Patients who had recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities of AML even though the bone marrow blast percent is lower than 20%
Exclusion Criteria
- •Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- •Down syndrome AML
- •Therapy-related AML
- •AML developed from myelodysplastic syndrome or other marrow failure syndrome
- •Isolated myeloid sarcoma without bone marrow involvement
- •Patients who cannot undergo chemotherapy as scheduled due to serious complications at diagnosis
Arms & Interventions
Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia
I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Intervention: Cytarabine
Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia
I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Intervention: Idarubicin
Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia
I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Intervention: Mitoxantrone
Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia
I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Intervention: Etoposide
Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia
I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning
Intervention: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Rate of event free survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes
- Proportion of patients who achieved complete remission(Up to 3 months)