Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02848183
NCT02848183
Unknown
Phase 2

Optimal Treatment Strategy Based on Prognostic Groups for Pediatric de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Samsung Medical Center3 sites in 1 country350 target enrollmentJanuary 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Cytarabine
Conditions
Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Enrollment
350
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Rate of event free survival
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to optimize therapy according to the known risk factors and treatment response in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Detailed Description

I. Risk group assessment Favorable prognosis group: Low risk features + Good response Intermediate prognosis group: 1. Low risk features + Delayed response-1 2. Standard risk features + Good response 3. Standard risk features + Delayed response-1 Poor prognosis group: 1. Any high risk features irrespective of treatment response 2. Any delayed response-2 irrespective of risk features 3. Any refractory state irrespective of risk features 4. Any early relapse II. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide III. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2016
End Date
December 2020
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients who were newly diagnosed with de novo AML
  • Patients who had recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities of AML even though the bone marrow blast percent is lower than 20%

Exclusion Criteria

  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Down syndrome AML
  • Therapy-related AML
  • AML developed from myelodysplastic syndrome or other marrow failure syndrome
  • Isolated myeloid sarcoma without bone marrow involvement
  • Patients who cannot undergo chemotherapy as scheduled due to serious complications at diagnosis

Arms & Interventions

Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia

I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Intervention: Cytarabine

Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia

I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Intervention: Idarubicin

Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia

I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Intervention: Mitoxantrone

Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia

I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Intervention: Etoposide

Pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia

I. Chemotherapy Induction-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Induction-2: High dose (HD) cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-1: Cytarabine + idarubicin Consolidation-2: HD cytarabine + etoposide Consolidation-3: HD cytarabine + mitoxantrone Consolidation-4: HD cytarabine + etoposide II. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) Favorable prognosis group: chemotherapy only Intermediate prognosis group: chemotherapy or HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning Poor prognosis group: HSCT with myeloablative conditioning

Intervention: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rate of event free survival

Time Frame: Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Proportion of patients who achieved complete remission(Up to 3 months)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials