Two Anesthetic Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Conditions
- Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnesthesia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00894751
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between the investigators' two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI. Quality of care will be measured by time spent in the MRI room as well as parental satisfaction, frequency of interruptions of the MRI scan, incidence-severity of respiratory complications, post anesthesia agitation, and time spent in the induction room, MRI room, and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 98
- Subjects presenting as out-patients, scheduled to receive an anesthetic for MRI of body (spine, chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis) and/or extremity (arm and/or leg).
- The subject must be a candidate for both anesthetic techniques. This decision will be made by a staff member of the Department of Anesthesiology. This staff member will not be a member of the study team and will obtain the consent for Anesthesia.
- The subjects must be 12 months to 7 years (inclusive of the seventh year).
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study.
-
The subject is residing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
-
Anxiolytic medication is ordered before the MRI (e.g., midazolam or ketamine).
-
The subject has a history or a family (parent or sibling) history of malignant hyperthermia.
-
The subject has life-threatening, medical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 4, 5 or 6).
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scale is a measure of physical status or how healthy the patient is.
- For our study, we will focus on children which are defined as ASA I, II or III which means a healthy child (ASA I), a child with a systemic disease that is mild and well controlled (ASA II) or a child with systemic disease that is severe and controlled (ASA III).
-
The subject is allergic to or has a contraindication to any of the drugs used in the study.
-
The subject has previously been treated under this protocol.
-
The subject has a tracheostomy or other mechanical airway device.
-
The subject has received within the past 12 hours an oral or intravenous alpha-adrenergic, beta-adrenergic agonist, or antagonist drugs (e.g., clonidine, propranolol, albuterol).
-
The subject is not scheduled to receive anesthesia-sedation care for the MRI.
-
The subject received one of the anesthetic regimens for the same MRI during the past six months.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description propofol propofol Determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI. dexmedetomidine dexmedetomidine Determine if there is a significant difference in the quality of care between our two standard anesthesia techniques for children undergoing a MRI of the body and/or extremity MRI.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary outcome variable will be the time spent in the MRI room 2 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary outcome variables include incidence-severity of respiratory complications 2 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States