MedPath

Comparison Between Moderate-high Interval Exercise and Moderate Continuous Exercise in an Advanced Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Myocardial Infarction
Coronary Artery Disease
Registration Number
NCT02162290
Lead Sponsor
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Brief Summary

The research will study the differences between interval training and continuous training among cardiac patients in a cardiac rehabilitation facility.

The main objectives are:

1. Functional capacity measures (VO2 max).

2. Cardiac risk factors

3. Quality of life assessments.

Study hypothesis:

Interval training will be more effective in improving functional capacity, cardiac risk factors and quality of life, compared to continuous training.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients undergone:

    • Myocardial infarction
    • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
    • Coronary artery bypass graft
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with:

    • Severe ischemia or angina
    • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
    • Pacemakers transplants
    • Severe left ventricular dysfunctions
    • Uncontrolled arrhythmias

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maximal functional capacity9 months

Outcome is assessed at baseline, after 3 months and at nine months

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Asaf Harofe Medical Center

🇮🇱

Beer Yaacov, Israel

Asaf Harofe Medical Center
🇮🇱Beer Yaacov, Israel

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.