Systolic Time Intervals a Prognostic Tool of Heart Failure in Emergency Departement (STI/AHF)
- Conditions
- DyspneaHeart Failure
- Interventions
- Device: biopacDiagnostic Test: prognostic scores
- Registration Number
- NCT03831204
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Monastir
- Brief Summary
The performance of STIs and clinical scores alone and their combination to predict short term prognosis of acute decompensated heart failure.
- Detailed Description
Acute heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and death.Prediction of these adverse events is still challenging.
STI is an old technique based on the recording of two parameters: electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram, and from them measuring the different systolic intervals:
pre-ejection period (PEP),electro-mechanic activation time (EMAT), Left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and systolic time ratio (RTS) were measured.
The aim of these study is to demonstrate whether systolic time intervals (STIs) can improve clinical scores EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) and GWTG-HF (Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure) for predicting 30 day mortality and readmission in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the ED.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 642
- non traumatic dyspnea
- age more than 18 years old.
- ECG diagnostic for acute myocardial infarction
- ischemic chest pain within the prior 24 hours
- history of a heart transplant
- pericardial effusion
- chest wall deformity suspected of causing dyspnea
- coma
- shock,Mechanical Ventilation, vasopressor drugs
- arrhythmia serious and sustained,
- pace maker
- severe mitral valve disease,
- severe pulmonary arterial hypertension
- renal failure with creatinine >350micromol/l
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AHF/HFrEF prognostic scores AHF with reduced ejection fraction Acoustic cardiography was performed for all participants using the BIOPAC Prognostic scores were calculated for every patient AHF/HFpEF biopac AHF with preserved ejection fraction Acoustic cardiography was performed for all participants using the BIOPAC Prognostic scores were calculated for every patient AHF/HFpEF prognostic scores AHF with preserved ejection fraction Acoustic cardiography was performed for all participants using the BIOPAC Prognostic scores were calculated for every patient AHF/HFrEF biopac AHF with reduced ejection fraction Acoustic cardiography was performed for all participants using the BIOPAC Prognostic scores were calculated for every patient
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method compare the STIs prognostic performance against clinical scores 30 days the area under ROC curve of the Systolic Time Intervals compared to the one of the EFFECT and GWTG HF scores
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method compare the STI prognostic performance between HFpEF and HFrEF patients 30 days compare the STI prognostic performance between HFpEF and HFrEF patients using the area under curve estimation of the ROC curve of the three systolic time intervals (PEP;EMAT measured in milliseconds,and PEP/EMAT) of the two groups
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Emergency department of university hospital Fattouma Bourguiba of Monastir Monastir, Monastir Tunisia
🇹🇳Monastir, Tunisia