Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02504164
NCT02504164
Completed
Not Applicable

Effect of Midazolam Premedication on the Satisfaction Levels of Patients After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Yonsei University1 site in 1 country72 target enrollmentSeptember 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
No premedication
Conditions
Early Gastric Cancer
Sponsor
Yonsei University
Enrollment
72
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Willingness to receive same method of sedation for ESD in the future as yes or no
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is commonly performed under light to moderate sedation, and minimizing patient movement is of key importance for successful outcome. Propofol has widely replaced benzodiazepines as sedative drug of choice, and has been reported to enhance the quality of procedure in our past study. However, despite higher satisfaction scores of the endoscopists and faster post-procedural recovery, patient satisfaction scores were found to be higher in patients that received midazolam and meperidine instead of propofol and remifentanil. This seems to be due to the anterograde amnestic effects of midazolam rather than the quality of sedation itself. Investigator hypothesized that by premedicating the patient with low lose midazolam before receiving sedation for ESD with propofol and fentanyl, patient satisfaction would be enhanced without affecting endoscopic performance.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2014
End Date
December 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients over the age of 19 diagnosed with early gastric cancer or gastric adenoma that are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • American society of anesthesiologist physical status 1\~3

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Patients that received sedatives within 24 hours prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • History of gastrectomy or previous endoscopic submucosal dissection at same site
  • Allergies to propofol or its ingredients, soybeans or peanuts
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients with severe debilitating underlying medical conditions
  • Patients with altered mental status
  • Illiterate patients or foreigners

Arms & Interventions

No premedication

No premedication before sedation

Intervention: No premedication

Midazolam

Premedication with midazolam before sedation

Intervention: midazolam 0.02mg/kg

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Willingness to receive same method of sedation for ESD in the future as yes or no

Time Frame: 24 hours after ESD

Any recall of the ESD procedure on a scale from 0 to 2 (0; no recall, 1; partial recall, 2; can recall most of procedure)

Time Frame: 24 hours after ESD

Post-procedural pain on a VAS scale of 0 to 10

Time Frame: at 1 hour and 24 hours after ESD

Overall patient satisfaction scores on a scale from 0 to 10

Time Frame: 24 hours after ESD

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials