MedPath

Magnesium Sulphate Versus Lidocaine for Control of Emergence Hypertension

Phase 1
Conditions
Hypertension
Craniotomy
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03566329
Lead Sponsor
Ahmed Mohamed ELbadawy
Brief Summary

Post-craniotomy emergence hypertension is a common phenomenon that may predispose to development of intracranial hematoma and cerebral edema.The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Mgso4 versus lidocaine infusion for control of emergence hypertension after craniotomy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA physical status Ι or Π.
  • scheduled patients for brain tumor excision.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Hepatic, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, or endocrine impairment.
  • Signs of increased intracranial pressure or allergy to any of the used drugs.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NaCl 0.9% normal salineNormal salineNormal saline infusion with the same rate as the study drugs
Magnesium sulphateMagnesium sulphate50 mg/kg over 10 minutes loading followed by 15mg/kg/hr infusion
lidocaine hydrochlorideLidocaine Hydrochloride1.5mg/kg loading followed by 2mg/kg/hr infusion
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
postcraniotomy emergence hypertension response to the study drugs4hours

The number of the patients who have systolic blood pressure below 140 mmH during emergence of anesthesia after craniotomy for brain tumors in each group

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recovery time2 hours

Time till discharge from PACU

Incidence of side effects of the used drugs4 hours

measure of safety

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ahmed ELbadawy

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Ahmed ELbadawy
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed ELbadawy
Contact

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.