Magnesium Sulphate Versus Lidocaine for Control of Emergence Hypertension
Phase 1
- Conditions
- HypertensionCraniotomy
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03566329
- Lead Sponsor
- Ahmed Mohamed ELbadawy
- Brief Summary
Post-craniotomy emergence hypertension is a common phenomenon that may predispose to development of intracranial hematoma and cerebral edema.The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Mgso4 versus lidocaine infusion for control of emergence hypertension after craniotomy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
Inclusion Criteria
- ASA physical status Ι or Π.
- scheduled patients for brain tumor excision.
Exclusion Criteria
- Hepatic, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, or endocrine impairment.
- Signs of increased intracranial pressure or allergy to any of the used drugs.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description NaCl 0.9% normal saline Normal saline Normal saline infusion with the same rate as the study drugs Magnesium sulphate Magnesium sulphate 50 mg/kg over 10 minutes loading followed by 15mg/kg/hr infusion lidocaine hydrochloride Lidocaine Hydrochloride 1.5mg/kg loading followed by 2mg/kg/hr infusion
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postcraniotomy emergence hypertension response to the study drugs 4hours The number of the patients who have systolic blood pressure below 140 mmH during emergence of anesthesia after craniotomy for brain tumors in each group
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recovery time 2 hours Time till discharge from PACU
Incidence of side effects of the used drugs 4 hours measure of safety
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ahmed ELbadawy
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed ELbadawy🇪🇬Cairo, EgyptAhmed ELbadawyContact