Neurophysiological and Acute Pharmacological Studies in FXS Patients
- Conditions
- Fragile X Syndrome
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02998151
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to utilize neurophysiologic assessments, behavioral measures and clinical measures to assess how much deficits associated with Fragile X Syndrome from pre-dose to post-dose using pharmacology.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
- Subjects ages 15-55, with fragile X syndrome (FXS) who completed the study entitled "Mechanisms and brain circuits underlying fragile X syndrome (IRB # 2015-8425). FXS is defined as full FMR1 mutations (>200 CGG repeats) confirmed by genetic testing.
- General good health as determined by physical exam, medical history and laboratory work up.
- Subjects with a history of intolerance to acamprosate, lovastatin, or minocycline will be excluded.
- Subjects will also be excluded if they have taken any investigational drug within 3 months, have a history of substance abuse or dependence within 6 months, or significant psychiatric or central nervous system neurological disease unrelated to FXS.
- Uncontrolled seizures impact EEG data as do anticonvulsants, barbiturates, lithium and benzodiazepines and are exclusions (within 5 half-lives). Those taking other psychiatric medications must be on stable doses for 4 weeks before any testing.
- For female subjects of child bearing potential, a positive urine pregnancy test.
- Potential subjects with a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min will be excluded.
- Identified medical issues, inability to tolerate study procedures or study drug per the discretion of the Principal Investigator.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description All Study Participants Placebo Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed. All Study Participants Acamprosate Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed. All Study Participants Lovastatin Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed. All Study Participants Minocycline Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed. All Study Participants Baclofen Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in EEG Relative Gamma Power Pre-dose, 4-hour post-dose EEG relative gamma power at rest was calculated as the percent of power in the gamma frequencies relative to the sum of power in all frequency bands, averaged across electrodes, and calculated separately at pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. To assess the impact of drug, the pre-dose relative gamma power was subtracted from post-dose relative gamma power. Higher numbers indicate more relative gamma power post-dose; lower numbers indicate more relative gamma power pre-dose.
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement 4-hour post-dose The Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has changed relative to pre-dose, from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task 4-hour post-dose Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities III Auditory Attention subscale. Participants must identify orally presented words amid increasingly intense background noise. The scores for this subtask range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Raw scores for this subscale are reported (rather than standard scores, or age- or grade-equivalents).
Change From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose Pre-dose, 4-hour post dose Four 10-item lists of unrelated words were presented orally to the examinee who was then required to immediately recall words presented, at both pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. The impact of drug was assessed by subtracting the number of words remembered post-dose from the number of words remembered pre-dose. Lower numbers indicate more words remembered post-dose; higher numbers indicate more words remembered pre-dose.
Test of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness Predose, 4-hour post-dose Computerized task where an examinee is required to push a key when a target stimulus is presented on the screen. Scores are presented as change in median reaction time (RT), in milliseconds.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States