Home-base Kidney Care in Zuni Indians
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Educational and lifestyle coaching
- Registration Number
- NCT02915029
- Lead Sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Brief Summary
People reach End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) due to progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD is associated with increased risks for heart disease and death. The burden of chronic kidney disease is increased among minority populations compare to Caucasians. The Zuni Indians are experiencing an epidemic of chronic kidney disease is due primarily to the high rates of obesity and diabetes. The present study entitled Home-Based Kidney Care is designed to delay / reduce rate of ESRD by early interventions in CKD. Investigators propose to assess the safety and efficacy of conducting a full-scale study to determine if home based care delivered by a collaborative team composed of community health workers and University of New Mexico faculty will decrease the risk for the development and the progression of CKD.
- Detailed Description
Hypothesis: (1) The Zuni Health Initiative (ZHI) can integrate an innovative approach to Home based kidney care (HBKC) utilizing tribal Community Health Representatives (CHRs), Point of Care (POC) technology, telemedicine and motivational messaging in conjunction with patient preferences and Patient Activation Measures (PAM) into the chronic care model to improve the detection and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and related risk factors; (2) This model is generalizable to other high-risk communities e.g., Hispanic and American Indians in Guadalupe, AZ being studied by NIDDK, NIH-Phoenix.
Specific Aim 1: Re-phenotype prior participants, to identify incident cases of CKD, estimate progression rates, and identify participants for the proposed study of HBKC;
Specific Aim 2: Conduct a pilot study of HBKC in 120 people. Randomize households in a 1:1 allocation to usual care versus HBKC. Compare the changes in Patient Activation measure (PAM), Adherence, BP, weight, HbA1c, UACR, eGFR and lipid profiles between the two groups over the 1-year intervention period;
Specific Aim 3: Inform the design of the full-scale study by estimating anticipated recruitment, adherence and dropout rates, sample size and reassessing the approach;
Specific Aim 4: Assess the exportability of the HBKC model to Hispanics and American Indians in Guadalupe, AZ.
Study Outcomes: (1) The PAM and adherence; (2) Changes in clinical phenotypes including Cr, UACR, A1c, body weight, BMI, fasting glucose, blood pressure (BP), plasma lipids, and inflammatory markers; (3) Changes in the quantitative traits such as diet and scores from a battery of mental-health, self-efficacy, and quality of life instruments.
Health Impact: The active participation of the Zuni tribal leadership and IHS in this protocol, and the general affordability of Zuni native CHR personnel, render the outcomes that will be demonstrated by this proposal easily sustainable over the long term. If successful, this program has the potential to change best-practices for CKD progression and to reduce health disparities in a cost-effective and sustainable manner.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 125
- Clinical diagnosis of diabetes
- Clinical diagnosis of microalbuminuria
- Must be living in a household with more than 1 living participant
- Age 21 to 80 years
- Must have negative pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential
- Life expectancy < 1 year
- On dialysis
- With renal transplant
- Pregnancy or absence of reliable birth control in women of child-bearing potential
- Malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer
- Blind
- Unwilling or unable to give informed consent.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Education and Lifestyle Coaching Educational and lifestyle coaching Education and life style coaching includes: education about diabetes and kidney disease Coaching /counseling about lifestyle, nutrition and medication adherence
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Level Greater Than 2 12 months follow-up Participants in an "Activated" category. Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire gives total score of activation as well as levels (stages) of patient activation.
PAM total score can range form 0-100 with higher score reflecting higher level of activation in Patient health care.
PAM levels (Stages) 1 through 4 with 1 being the lowest activation and 4 being the highest activation level. Level 1 labeled as patient being dis-engaged, Level 2 labeled as patient becoming aware of health condition but still struggling, level 3 labeled as patient is taking action and gaining control of their health care and level 4 labeled as maintaining behaviors and pushing forward - for our analysis purposes we classified participants into levels 3 and 4 (activated) and level 1 and 2 as not activated.
We collected data about Changes in PAM score as well as levels (stages) from baseline to 12 months of intervention and compare it to Usual care group.Patient Activation Measure (PAM) -13 Item Questionnaire 12 months follow-up minus baseline values Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire gives total score of activation as well as levels (stages) of patient activation.
PAM total score can range form 0-100 with higher score reflecting higher level of activation in Patient health care.
PAM levels (Stages) 1 through 4 with 1 being the lowest activation and 4 being the highest activation level.
We collected data about Changes in PAM score as well as levels (stages) from baseline to 12 months of intervention and compare it to Usual care group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diastolic Blood Pressure 12 months minus baseline values Changes in diastolic blood pressure on study.
Body Mass Index 12 months minus baseline values Changes in the value of body mass index (BMI)
Serum Total Cholesterol 12 months minus baseline values Change in total cholesterol on study
Systolic Blood Pressure 12 months minus baseline values Changes in Systolic blood pressure over study.
High-density Lipoprotein HDL Cholesterol 12 months minus baseline values Change in serum HDL cholesterol on study
eGFR 12 months minus baseline values Changes in estimated (via CKD-EPI) Glomerular Filtration Rate.
Low-density Lipoprotein LDL Cholesterol 12 months minus baseline values Changes in serum LDL cholesterol on study
Triglycerides 12 months minus baseline values Change in serum triglycerides on study
Serum Total Protein 12 months minus baseline values Change in total protein on study
8-Item Morisky Score 12 months minus baseline values Change in Morisky total score on study.The 8-item Morisky scale is a validated scale designed to estimate the risk of medication non-adherence. The Scale of the total score ranges from 0 to 8. We only report a total score. For a reported scale,
* Zero reflects worse medication adherence and
* 8 reflects better medication adherence We didn't combine the subscales to compute a total score, but the total score does reflect the number of individual items that were endorsed.A1c 12 months minus baseline values Changes in clinical values
High Sensitive C-reactive Protein-hsCRP 12 months minus baseline values Changes in the serum c-reactive protein on study
UACR 12 months minus baseline values change in urinary albumin to creatinine ratio on study.
KDQOL-Symptom/Problem 12 months minus baseline values Changes on study of symptom/problem list from quality of life (KDQOL-36). Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey, a kidney-disease-specific quality of life instrument that assesses five domains: general physical health (SF-12 Physical), mental health (SF-12 Mental), burden of kidney disease (BKD), disease symptoms problem list (SP), and effects of kidney disease (EKD). For all KDQOL scales, a higher score indicates better quality of life. All domain scales can range from 0-100.
KDQOL-EKD 12 months minus baseline values Changes in effects of kidney disease score from quality of life (KDQOL). Changes on study of effect of kidney disease from quality of life (KDQOL-36). Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey, a kidney-disease-specific quality of life instrument that assesses five domains: general physical health (SF-12 Physical), mental health (SF-12 Mental), burden of kidney disease (BKD), disease symptoms problem list (SP), and effects of kidney disease (EKD). For all KDQOL scales, a higher score indicates better quality of life. All domain scales can range from 0-100.
KDQOL-SF12 Physical Score 12 months minus baseline values Changes on study of SF12 physical quality of life scale from the KDQOL-36. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey, a kidney-disease-specific quality of life instrument that assesses five domains: general physical health (SF-12 Physical), mental health (SF-12 Mental), burden of kidney disease (BKD), disease symptoms problem list (SP), and effects of kidney disease (EKD). For all KDQOL scales, a higher score indicates better quality of life. All domain scales can range from 0-100.
KDQOL-BKD 12 months minus baseline values Change on study of burden of kidney disease score from KDQOL-36. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey, a kidney-disease-specific quality of life instrument that assesses five domains: general physical health (SF-12 Physical), mental health (SF-12 Mental), burden of kidney disease (BKD), disease symptoms problem list (SP), and effects of kidney disease (EKD). For all KDQOL scales, a higher score indicates better quality of life. All domain scales can range from 0-100.
KDQOL-SF12 Mental Score 12 months minus baseline values Change on study of SF12 mental quality of life scale from the KDQOL-36 Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey, a kidney-disease-specific quality of life instrument that assesses five domains: general physical health (SF-12 Physical), mental health (SF-12 Mental), burden of kidney disease (BKD), disease symptoms problem list (SP), and effects of kidney disease (EKD). For all KDQOL scales, a higher score indicates better quality of life. All domain scales can range from 0-100.