MedPath

A Study to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Psoriasis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03090100
Lead Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared with secukinumab for the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Detailed Description

The study consists of Screening Phase(4 weeks before administration of study drug),Active Treatment Phase(Week 0-Week 44),Follow Up Phase(Week 44-Week 56).During various study periods,safety assessments(example\[e.g\] recording of adverse events,Vital signs,Tuberculosis evaluation,Chest radiograph,Urine pregnancy Test);Efficacy assessments(e.g IGA,PASI);Clinical Laboratory Assessments(e.g haematology,chemistry);Biomarkers/Genetic evaluations,will be performed per the study procedures.The primary hypotheses are that guselkumab treatment is non-inferior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48 with noninferiority margin of 10% and,once non-inferiority is established,that guselkumab is superior to secukinumab as assessed by proportion of participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 48.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1048
Inclusion Criteria
  • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without [Psoriatic Arthritis]PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at Week 0 and agree to urine pregnancy testing before receiving injections
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 3 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree not to receive a Bacille Calmette-GuĂ©rin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has previously received guselkumab or secukinumab
  • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
  • Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
  • Is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures because of poor tolerability or lack of easy access to veins

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group I: Guselkumab Plus PlaceboPlaceboParticipants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections will be administered to maintain the blind.
Group II: SecukinumabSecukinumabParticipants will receive 2 injections of active secukinumab subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks (q4w) thereafter through Week 44.
Group I: Guselkumab Plus PlaceboGuselkumabParticipants will receive 1 injection of active guselkumab and 1 injection of placebo when guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44) or 2 injections of placebo when no guselkumab is scheduled to be administered (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40). Placebo injections will be administered to maintain the blind.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48Week 48

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 48Week 48

The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 16Week 16

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-90 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-90 Responders at Week 16Week 48

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Both Week 12 and 48Week 12 and 48

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 response at both Week 12 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 12Week 12

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Due to failing to achieve superiority of prior secondary endpoint, no formal statistical testing was performed for endpoints from this point onwards.

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) at Week 48Week 48

The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 16Week 16

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 12Week 12

The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-75 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-75 Responders at Week 12Week 48

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 12Week 12

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Both Week 16 and 48Week 16 and 48

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 response at both Week 16 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at All 7 Visits From Week 24 Through Week 48Week 24 up to Week 48

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Percentage of participants who achieved a PASI-90 response at all 7 visits from Week 24 to 48 (Week 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48) was reported.

Percentage of Participants With IGA Responses Through Week 56Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56

The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-100 Response at Week 48Week 48

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 100 response was defined as 100% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16Week 16

The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Response (PASI 100, PASI-90, PASI-75 and PASI-50) Over Time From Week 1 to Week 56Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56

PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with \>=50%, \>= 75%, \>=90% and 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively.

Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 56Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and Week 56

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Trial Locations

Locations (141)

Dermatologicka ambulance

🇨🇿

Svitavy, Czechia

Indiana Clinical Trial Center

🇺🇸

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Central Dermatology

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Arlington Dermatology

🇺🇸

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

Dermatologists of Greater Columbus

🇺🇸

Bexley, Ohio, United States

Guenther Dermatology Research Centre

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

Sinclair Dermatology

🇦🇺

East Melbourne, Australia

Skin&Cancer Foundation Inc

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Australia

Veracity Clinical Research

🇦🇺

Woolloongabba, Australia

Woden Dermatology

🇦🇺

Woden, Australia

Nemocnice Jihlava

🇨🇿

Jihlava, Czechia

Fremantle Dermatology

🇦🇺

Fremantle, Australia

St George Dermatology & Skin Cancer Centre

🇦🇺

Kogarah, Australia

Nemocnice Novy Jicin a.s.

🇨🇿

Novy Jicin, Czechia

Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava

🇨🇿

Ostrava- Poruba, Czechia

Royal Melbourne Hospital

🇦🇺

Parkville, Australia

Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd

🇦🇺

Hectorville, Australia

Windsor Dermatology

🇺🇸

East Windsor, New Jersey, United States

Academic Dermatology Associates

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Clinical Partners

🇺🇸

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

Dermatology Consulting Services, PLLC

🇺🇸

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Virginia Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady

🇨🇿

Praha, Czechia

Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical

🇨🇦

Surrey, Canada

Kozni ambulance Kutna Hora, s.r.o.

🇨🇿

Kutna Hora, Czechia

Premier Specialists

🇦🇺

Kogarah, Australia

Westmead Hospital

🇦🇺

Westmead, Australia

The Skin Centre

🇦🇺

Benowa, Australia

Innovaderm Research

🇨🇦

Montreal, Canada

Universitatsklinikum Essen

🇩🇪

Essen, Germany

Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon

🇪🇸

Alcorcon, Spain

Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem

🇨🇿

Usti Nad Labem, Czechia

Hosp. Univ. de Cruces

🇪🇸

Barakaldo, Spain

ICH Hopital A. Morvan

🇫🇷

Brest, France

CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

🇪🇸

Badalona, Spain

Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.

🇭🇺

Veszprem, Hungary

Hosp. Del Mar

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem

🇭🇺

Szeged, Hungary

Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de Torrejon

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Minnesota Clinical Study Center

🇺🇸

Fridley, Minnesota, United States

The Ohio State University

🇺🇸

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Dermatology Specialists

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

San Luis Dermatology & Laser Clinic, Inc

🇺🇸

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Renstar Medical Research

🇺🇸

Ocala, Florida, United States

Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center

🇺🇸

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

DERMAMEDICA s.r.o.

🇨🇿

Nachod, Czechia

Hopital Charles Nicolle

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

🇩🇪

Muenster, Germany

Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktatokorhaz

🇭🇺

Kaposvar, Hungary

Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz

🇭🇺

Miskolc, Hungary

Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz

🇭🇺

Szombathely, Hungary

CRC Sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Hosp. Gral. Univ. de Alicante

🇪🇸

Alicante, Spain

CCA Medical Research Corporation

🇨🇦

Ajax, Canada

Eastern Canada Research Associates

🇨🇦

Halifax, Canada

Florida Academic Dermatology Centers

🇺🇸

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Great Lakes Research Group

🇺🇸

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Centre Dermatologique

🇨🇦

Quebec, Canada

Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis

🇫🇷

La Rochelle, France

CHU de Nice Hopital de l Archet

🇫🇷

Nice, France

Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Park Avenue Dermatology

🇺🇸

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Universitaetsklinik Luebeck

🇩🇪

Luebeck, Germany

Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen

🇩🇪

Tuebingen, Germany

Centrovital

🇩🇪

Witten, Germany

Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

🇭🇺

Debrecen, Hungary

Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o.o

🇵🇱

Gdansk, Poland

Dermatrials Research

🇨🇦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

ISA GmbH

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

SCIderm GmbH

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Hamzavi Dermatology

🇺🇸

Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States

DermAssociates, PC

🇺🇸

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Skin Centre for Dermatology

🇨🇦

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

DermEdge Research

🇨🇦

Mississauga, Canada

Stratica Medical

🇨🇦

Edmonton, Canada

CHU Bordeaux - Hopital St Andre

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Universitatsklinikum Bonn

🇩🇪

Bonn, Germany

K. Papp Clinical Research

🇨🇦

Waterloo, Canada

XLR8 Medical Research

🇨🇦

Windsor, Canada

Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Kiel

🇩🇪

Kiel, Germany

Specderm Poznańska sp. j.

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Solumed S.C.

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Le Bateau Blanc

🇫🇷

Martigues, France

University Hospital Dresden

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte (CCM) Allergie Center

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt

🇩🇪

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Bacs-kiskun Megyei Korhaz

🇭🇺

Kecskemet, Hungary

Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem

🇭🇺

Pecs, Hungary

NZOZ Osteo-Medic S.C. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza

🇵🇱

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze

🇵🇱

Elblag, Poland

Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne

🇵🇱

Swidnik, Poland

Przychodnia Specjalistyczna High-Med

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Universitaetsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Hautarztpraxis

🇩🇪

Mahlow, Germany

MensingDerma research GmbH

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Technische Universitaet Muenchen

🇩🇪

Muenchen, Germany

Centrum Badawcze Wspolczesnej Terapii

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

NZOZ Poradnia Dermatologiczno-Wenerologiczna Mediderm

🇵🇱

Torun, Poland

Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Semmelweis Egyetem

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

DermMedica Sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Centrum Medyczne WroMedica

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

University of Alabama Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Southern California Dermatology

🇺🇸

Santa Ana, California, United States

Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

Clinical Research Center of Connecticut

🇺🇸

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Advanced Medical Research

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Henry Ford Medical Center

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Central Sooner Research

🇺🇸

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Southern California Permanente Medical Group

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

MedDerm Associates

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

Olympian Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Northshore Universite Healthsystem

🇺🇸

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Toronto Research Centre

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Oregon Medical Research Center

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

Menter Dermatology Research Institute

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Progressive Clinical Research

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Modern Research Associates

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Dermatology Associates of Seattle

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

Austin Dermatology Associates

🇺🇸

Austin, Texas, United States

Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de Basurto

🇪🇸

Bilbao Vizcaya, Spain

Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Reina Sofia

🇪🇸

Cordoba, Spain

Hosp. de Manises

🇪🇸

Manises, Spain

Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

Hosp. Provincial de Pontevedra

🇪🇸

Pontevedra, Spain

Hosp. Univ. La Paz

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Somerset Skin Centre

🇺🇸

Troy, Michigan, United States

North Bay Dermatology Centre

🇨🇦

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath