Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03271970
NCT03271970WithdrawnNot Applicable

The Anatomic Determinants of Perforation Induced Hearing Loss

Duke University0 sitesStarted: April 2017Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Withdrawn
Sponsor
Primary Endpoint
presence of perforation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to identify factors that may contribute to conductive hearing loss. Conductive hearing loss is a type that is due to a problem with the outer or middle ear. Because of this, sound does not travel through the ear normally. Perforated tympanic membranes of study patients will be photographed during the patient's routine visit using a digital otoscope. These pictures will be used to analyze perforation size as an absolute value as well as a percentage of the tympanic membrane. Audiometric results and CT scans of temporal bone (reports and images) collected as standard of care will be evaluated. Images of CT scans will be imported into a medical imaging software for creation of anatomically realistic 3D models of the middle ear and mastoid air space. Structural analysis on each 3D model will be conducted and analyzed, the volume of middle ear and mastoid air spaces will be recorded, and data points will be correlated with perforation size and location to audiogram results.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Between 18 and 89 years of age
  • Confirmed diagnosis of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
  • Treated for the above condition by a Duke physician
  • Received both a CT temporal bone scan interpreted by a Duke radiologist and audiometry at a Duke-based facility (both tests performed within four weeks of each other), as part of standard pre-operative workup

Exclusion Criteria

  • Temporal CT scan with inadequate resolution as per determination of study staff
  • Unable to provide written informed consent
  • Unable to read and understand English

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

presence of perforation

Time Frame: Day 1

Number of patients with perforations

absence of perforation

Time Frame: Day 1

number of patients without perforations

change in audiometric measurements

Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks

looking at difference between baseline and last observation

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Duke University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials