COVID-19 Testing Sample Acquisition Throughput and Efficiency
- Conditions
- Personal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV InfectionRespiratory Viral InfectionCovid19
- Interventions
- Other: Personal Protective Testing Booth
- Registration Number
- NCT04532411
- Lead Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Brief Summary
This QI project seeks to evaluate the relative test sample acquisition throughput, personal protective equipment utilization, and relative operational costs of provider-administered COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) nasal samples with and with the use of HEPA-filtered, positive pressure isolation booths.
- Detailed Description
Beginning in March 2020, the MGH began outpatient testing for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) utilizing a provider-administered nasal swab samples. This was administered with infection control protocols utilizing full PPE protection for health providers who would don and doff gowns and gloves with each sample acquisition. With an aim to decrease PPE usage and increase efficiency, personal protective booths with HEPA-filtered air called "Hexapods" were employed, after infection control approval, within the MGH system beginning on April 16, 2020.
Ambulatory Care Management at MGH systematically monitors testing completed and PPE usage on a weekly basis. Managers in charge of personnel changes shared necessary team structures and median salaries for different personnel involved with sample acquisition. MGH Materials management were able to report on costs related to consumable supplies used during testing.
In this investigation, this routinely collected data and averaged timed sample collection observations were used to compare before and after the Hexapod utilization.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28948
- All testing performed at designated outpatient SARS-CoV-2 at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) testing sites beginning March 2019.
- SARS-CoV-2 tests performed not performed within designated outpatient testing sites at MGH.
- Testing performed within the hospital for Emergency Department or Inpatient visits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Post-Booth Testing Personal Protective Testing Booth This cohort was comprised of samples acquired as a component of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) testing after implementation of the Hexapod personal protective booths.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Cost per Test After Hexapod Implementation Up to 22 weeks The difference in costs of collecting test samples before and after hexapod utilization will be calculated.
Change in Testing Throughput After Hexapod Implementation Up to 22 weeks Samples acquired per hour using the Hexapod booth will be assessed as an average over a minimum of 12 weeks of testing compared to baseline throughput before April 16th.
Change in Isolation Gowns Utilized After Hexapod Utilization Up to 22 weeks Gowns utilized per test will be assessed as an average over a minimum of 12 weeks of testing compared to baseline throughput before April 16th.
Return on Investment Up to 22 weeks The retail cost of the Hexapod booth will be divided by the average daily cost differential for testing observed and at maximum volume.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Testing Personnel Cost Per Test Up to 22 weeks The difference in median shift salaries before and after Hexapod implementation will be calculated.
Change in Cost of Isolation Gowns Utilized Up to 22 weeks Outcome 2 will be utilized to calculate the range of the change in cost of isolation gowns utilized compared to baseline usage for samples acquired before April 16th utilizing actual and quoted costs of gowns to Materials Management at MGH.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States