Liposomal Bupivacaine Plus Bupivacaine Peripheral Nerve Blockade Versus Ropivacaine Plus Dexamethasone Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff TearsShoulder Pain
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04737980
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery Florida
- Brief Summary
This study is a comparison of analgesia effect from peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) with liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine compared to PNB with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
- Detailed Description
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair(ARCR) addresses dysfunction and pain in individuals with rotator cuff tears who have failed conservative management. These procedures are typically performed in an outpatient setting. Single shot PNB with long acting local anesthetics have become the foundation of modern multimodal analgesia protocols. The reported analgesic benefits of PNB for shoulder surgery include reduced pain scores, opioid consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting, improved postoperative recovery and improvement of patient satisfaction. However, standard PNB with bupivacaine or ropivacaine have been associated with rebound pain resulting in a sudden onset of pain that can be refractory to treatment and often necessitates the use of significant quantities of opioids.
Side effects of opioid consumption include nausea, vomiting, sedation, constipation, respiratory depression, hypotension, ileus, urinary retention, dehydration and addiction. It is therefore desirable to minimize the requirement for opioid consumption after ARCR.
Liposomal bupivacaine injectable suspension and its potential use for PNB has been a recent topic of interest in an effort to provide patients with longer acting pain control after shoulder surgery compared to the use of bupivacaine or ropivacaine. Liposomal bupivacaine has a delayed onset of action so its practical use for PNB for ARCR requires the additive of bupivacaine to reduce pain during and immediately after surgery as a bridge to the onset of liposomal bupivacaine.
The purpose of this study is to determine if PNB utilizing liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine performs favorably to standard PNB with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed including worst pain reported postoperatively on a numeric rating scale(NRS), postoperative opioid consumption reported as oral morphine equivalent dosage(OMED) and the overall benefit of anesthesia (OBAS) as reported by the OBAS score.
The hypothesis of this study is that PNB with liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine will translate to lower postoperative daily NRS pain scores, decreased daily and total OMED consumed and lower OBAS scores compared to PNB with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone over the first 8 days following surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 92
- Full thickness tears of the Supraspinatus tendon
- Combined full thickness tears of the Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus tendon
-
Age < 18
-
Revision surgery
-
Chronic opioid use (>3 months prior to surgery)
-
Allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
-
Workers compensation or medical legal claim
-
Pulmonary disease
-
NSAID intolerance
-
Neurologic deficit of operative upper extremity
-
Concomitant full thickness subscapularis tear
- 2 tendon rotator cuff tear
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control Group: Interscalene block with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution Interscalene nerve block was performed utilizing ultrasound guidance with infiltration of 30ml of 0.5% ropivacaine combined with a 2 ml volume of 8mg of dexamethasone. Experimental Group: Interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine Liposomal bupivacaine Interscalene nerve block was performed utilizing ultrasound guidance with infiltration of 10 ml of liposomal bupivacaine 1.3% (133 mg) combined with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Experimental Group: Interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj Interscalene nerve block was performed utilizing ultrasound guidance with infiltration of 10 ml of liposomal bupivacaine 1.3% (133 mg) combined with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Control Group: Interscalene block with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone Dexamethasone Interscalene nerve block was performed utilizing ultrasound guidance with infiltration of 30ml of 0.5% ropivacaine combined with a 2 ml volume of 8mg of dexamethasone.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents 8 day period Total opioid consumption for entire 8 days after surgery
Overall benefit of anesthesia score (OBAS) up to 8 days Overall benefit of anesthesia score (OBAS) as reported by a participant for each preceding 24 hour period. OBAS is a numeric rating scale. A lower value denotes better pain control and less side effects from anesthesia. Range of scores from 0 to 28.
Participant reported "worst pain" level on a numeric rating scale after surgery up to 8 days Worst pain level experienced as reported on a numeric rating scale by a participant for each preceding 24 hour period. 0 on numeric rating scale denoting no pain and 10 denoting worst possible pain.
Daily morphine milligram equivalents of opioid up to 8 days Daily opioid consumption reported as OMED
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in pain from baseline up to 8 days Participant reported change in "worst pain" level on numeric rating scale from baseline (preoperative) "worst pain" to "worst pain" reported on each day after surgery.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
HSS Florida
🇺🇸West Palm Beach, Florida, United States