Video-based Training for Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Functions After Stroke: a New Treatment Exploiting the Mirror Neuron System
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Sponsor
- RWTH Aachen University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Wolf Motor Function Test
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The study hypothesizes superiority of the video-based training (observation combined with motor exercise, "video") over motor exercise alone ("non-video") and standard rehabilitation ("standard").
Detailed Description
The clinical study is a multicenter, open, randomized, controlled, paralleled group trial with three investigative arms. The study recruits at least 375 first stroke patients with certain motoric disabilities that are randomly assigned to either one experimental condition or one of two control conditions. Every individual patient participates for 31 (+/- 1) weeks in the trial (see fig. 1), the whole study is planned to last at least for 3 years. The recruitment and treatment of patients will last for 17 months during the trial. Patients undergo a baseline assessment for screening purposes and during the course of participation three further assessments of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. These endpoints will refer to the degree of recovered objective and subjective physical abilities due to the experimental treatment in comparison to the control comparators. Studies' hypotheses claim that the experimental treatment will lead to effects on the motoric abilities superior the effects elicited by the control treatments.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Hospitalized patient: discharge from rehabilitation within the following week; outpatient: insult between 6 weeks and 2 years in the past (controlled via medical history).
- •Age between 30 and 80 years, since older patients could probably not exercise the stamina necessary for a participation throughout the whole time course of the treatment (controlled via discharge letter from hospitalized patients, and note from the general practitioner from outpatients, respectively).
- •First clinically evident stroke so that the patient has no history of stroke related trainings and treatments (controlled via medical history).
- •Ischemic cortical or subcortical lesions in middle cerebral artery territory resulting mainly in defined motoric impairments (controlled via medical history).
- •Upper limb paresis (controlled via standard neurological examination).
- •Minimal movement ability of the paretic limb (controlled by MRC index ≥2 and ≤4: hand extension against gravity at wrist = 20° and at metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of each of the fingers = 10°) to participate in the treatments' physical training tasks.
- •If medication is needed: stable concomitant medication (controlled via discharge letter from hospitalized patients, and note from the general practitioner from outpatients, respectively)
- •Signed informed consent to participate in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Brain stem infarction. These lesion site results in further impairments that could interfere with treatment (controlled via discharge letter from hospitalized patients, and note from the general practitioner from outpatients, respectively).
- •Impaired level of consciousness that could prevent patient to understand and follow instructions throughout the intervention, and further result in inabilities to hold attentiveness and concentration to the treatment (controlled via standard neurological examination).
- •Severe aphasia that could prevent patient to understand and follow instruction throughout the intervention (controlled by administration of the Token test, TT, \> 11 incorrect reactions).
- •Dementia that could lead to impaired abilities to follow instructions (controlled by administration of the Mini-Mental-State Examination, MMSE, score \< 26).
- •Depression that could result in major difficulty of the patients motivational compliance to follow instructions and to participate in the interventions' tasks throughout the treatment (controlled by administration of the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI, score \< 15).
- •Apraxia that could lead to impaired abilities to follow instructions (controlled by administration of the Florida Apraxia Screening Test, FAST, \< 10 correct re-actions and/ or \> 10 incorrect reactions).
- •Neglect that could lead to impaired abilities to participate in the treatments observational tasks (controlled by administration of the Albert's Neglect Test, \> 1 line unchecked).
- •Severe psychiatric disorder, severe pulmonary or cardiovascular disease, or epilepsy that could lead to reduced abilities to participate in the treatments' task (controlled via discharge letter from hospitalized patients, and note from the general practitioner from outpatients, respectively).
- •Severe joint deformity of arthritic origin that could reduce the patients abilities in tasks demanding a functional physical execution thus resulting in the masking of possible training effects (controlled via standard neurological examination).
- •Motor problems not primarily unilateral or excessive pain in major affected limb that could reduce the patients abilities in tasks demanding a functional physical execution thus resulting in the masking of possible training effects (controlled via standard neurological examination).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Wolf Motor Function Test
Time Frame: 31 +/-1 weeks
Improvement of experimental group in standardized motor function test (Wolf Motor Function Test - WMFT) relative to control groups.
Secondary Outcomes
- Quality of Life(31 +/-1 weeks)