Flexible Intubation Scope With or Without Video Laryngoscope in Supporting Endotracheal Tube Placement in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Before Surgery

Not Applicable

Recruiting

Brief Summary: This trial studies how well flexible intubation scope with or without video laryngoscope works in supporting endotracheal tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer before surgery. Flexible intubation scope and video laryngoscope are devices that have a small camera to help the doctor see the patient's airway on a screen. Both devices may help the doctor who gives anesthesia prevent complications from placing the breathing tube (such as pain or mouth injury).

Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the rates of difficult endotracheal tube (ETT) placement using a flexible intubation scope (FIS) versus a combination of flexible intubation and video laryngoscopy in difficult airway management.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the ease of using a flexible intubation scope (FIS) with and without the use of the video laryngoscope (VL).

II. Total time for securing the airway.

III. Number of attempts required for intubation.

IV. Rate of failure at intubation.

V. Incidence of desaturation.

VI. Assessment for hoarseness, sore mouth, neck, or jaw, dysphonia, dysphagia, lip injury, tongue injury, or tooth damage.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo flexible scope intubation up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.

ARM B: Patients undergo flexible scope intubation and video laryngoscopy up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Ages ≥ 18 years of age
All surgical patients with known or suspected difficult airways that meet at least three (3) of the Difficult Airway criteria [Mallampati III-IV, Neck circumference > 40 cm, Sternomental distance < 12 cm, Thyromental distance < 6 cm, Mouth opening < 4 cm, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, Upper Lip Bite Test - ULBT (class III)] or history of radiation to the head and neck area or oral pathology obstructing the glottic view
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-IV
Has provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Arm A (flexible intubation scope)	Tracheal Intubation	Patients undergo flexible scope intubation up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.
Arm B (flexible intubation scope,video laryngoscope)	Laryngoscopy	Patients undergo flexible scope intubation and video laryngoscopy up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.
Arm B (flexible intubation scope,video laryngoscope)	Tracheal Intubation	Patients undergo flexible scope intubation and video laryngoscopy up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Rates of difficult endotracheal tube (ETT) placement	1 day	Estimated rates of difficult ETT will be provided using exact 95% confidence interval (CI) using the method of Clopper-Pearson.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Total time for securing the airway	1 day
Complications of difficult Endotracheal Tube (ETT) placement using a flexible intubation scope (FIS) versus a combination of flexible intubation and video laryngoscopy in difficult airway management.	1 day	For complications, researchers will assign a '0' for no complication arising and a '1' for any complications arising. The total score will range from 0 to 3 and will be summarized using frequencies and percentages related to each level of the total score and using the mean score and standard deviation, whichever is more appropriate.
Incidence of desaturation	1 day
Rate of failure at intubation	1 day
Number of attempts required for intubation	1 day