Influence on Food Liking of Adding Spices to Replace Sugar Using CLT
- Conditions
- Normal Subjects Who Agree to Participate in Taste Testing
- Interventions
- Other: Apple CrispOther: TeaOther: Oatmeal
- Registration Number
- NCT03139552
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Brief Summary
This study aims to reduce the amount of sugar in a particular food item and add spices to see if the food liking of that item rates as high or higher in a post meal survey. Through taste testing of the menu items (using sequential monadic CLT methodology) the investigators will determine an opinion of the participants. Results of these surveys will determine whether participants enjoy the reduced sugar options as much as their full sugar counterparts.
- Detailed Description
The investigators will compare the overall consumer acceptability of each of three test items (tea, oatmeal and apple crisp) across the three test conditions using central location test (CLT) and cross-over design. The three test conditions for each test item will be (1) Full sugar ("FS"), (2) reduced sugar (and calorie) with no added spice ("RS") and (3) reduced sugar (and calorie) plus spice ("RSS"). The two reduced sugar items will be matched for calories. Subjects will be provided the test items using sequential monadic CLT methodology (Central Location Test methodology which involves product evaluation after a brief exposure (one sample-subject contact) under standardized conditions whereby subjects are given each of the 3 recipes of each test item (e.g., oatmeal with full sugar, oatmeal with reduced sugar, oatmeal with reduced plus spice) back to back (all within one sitting) in a random order. The investigators are interested in using the sequential monadic CLT methodology and having subjects taste all 3 recipes of each item in one sitting which is a commonly used test modality for sensory studies.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 150
-ages 18-65
- diagnosed taste or sensory disorder
- known eating disorder
- allergies to test food/ingredients
- medical conditions that may adversely affect taste (ie: dysgeusia)
- inability to complete protocol or to participate in all three taste testing sessions
- personal dietary restrictions towards test items
- dislike of the particular food items to be served in taste tests
- subjects who do not consume foods or beverages that contain sugar or to which they have added sugar will be excluded
- subjects who have not consumed or would not be willing to consume hot tea, oatmeal or baked apple products will be excluded
- subjects who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant will be excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description full sugar recipe Apple Crisp Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar recipe Apple Crisp Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A full sugar recipe Tea Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar plus spice recipe Oatmeal Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A full sugar recipe Oatmeal Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar recipe Oatmeal Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar recipe Tea Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar plus spice recipe Apple Crisp Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A reduced sugar plus spice recipe Tea Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Liking of Apple Crisp Day of taste testing Overall liking of apple crisp with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )
Overall Liking of Tea day of taste testing Overall liking of tea with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )
Overall Liking of Oatmeal day of taste testing Overall liking of oatmeal with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Apple Crisp day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Tea Day of taste testings Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Oatmeal day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Tea day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Tea day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.
Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal day of taste testing Subjects ranked each recipe in order of likability as first, second or third.