跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03139552
NCT03139552已完成不适用

Influence of Food Liking of Adding Spices to Replace Dietary Sugar Using Sequential Monadic CLT Methodology

University of Colorado, Denver0 个研究点目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2016年10月17日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
150
主要终点
Overall Liking of Apple Crisp

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to reduce the amount of sugar in a particular food item and add spices to see if the food liking of that item rates as high or higher in a post meal survey. Through taste testing of the menu items (using sequential monadic CLT methodology) the investigators will determine an opinion of the participants. Results of these surveys will determine whether participants enjoy the reduced sugar options as much as their full sugar counterparts.

详细描述

The investigators will compare the overall consumer acceptability of each of three test items (tea, oatmeal and apple crisp) across the three test conditions using central location test (CLT) and cross-over design. The three test conditions for each test item will be (1) Full sugar ("FS"), (2) reduced sugar (and calorie) with no added spice ("RS") and (3) reduced sugar (and calorie) plus spice ("RSS"). The two reduced sugar items will be matched for calories. Subjects will be provided the test items using sequential monadic CLT methodology (Central Location Test methodology which involves product evaluation after a brief exposure (one sample-subject contact) under standardized conditions whereby subjects are given each of the 3 recipes of each test item (e.g., oatmeal with full sugar, oatmeal with reduced sugar, oatmeal with reduced plus spice) back to back (all within one sitting) in a random order. The investigators are interested in using the sequential monadic CLT methodology and having subjects taste all 3 recipes of each item in one sitting which is a commonly used test modality for sensory studies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Subjects were blind to the differences in recipes when taste testing.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ages 18-65

排除标准

  • diagnosed taste or sensory disorder
  • known eating disorder
  • allergies to test food/ingredients
  • medical conditions that may adversely affect taste (ie: dysgeusia)
  • inability to complete protocol or to participate in all three taste testing sessions
  • personal dietary restrictions towards test items
  • dislike of the particular food items to be served in taste tests
  • subjects who do not consume foods or beverages that contain sugar or to which they have added sugar will be excluded
  • subjects who have not consumed or would not be willing to consume hot tea, oatmeal or baked apple products will be excluded
  • subjects who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant will be excluded

研究组 & 干预措施

full sugar recipe

Active Comparator

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Apple Crisp (Other)

full sugar recipe

Active Comparator

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Tea (Other)

reduced sugar recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Apple Crisp (Other)

reduced sugar recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Tea (Other)

reduced sugar plus spice recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Apple Crisp (Other)

reduced sugar plus spice recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Tea (Other)

reduced sugar plus spice recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Oatmeal (Other)

reduced sugar recipe

Experimental

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Oatmeal (Other)

full sugar recipe

Active Comparator

Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal). The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS):

Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A

干预措施: Oatmeal (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Overall Liking of Apple Crisp

时间窗: Day of taste testing

Overall liking of apple crisp with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )

Overall Liking of Tea

时间窗: day of taste testing

Overall liking of tea with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )

Overall Liking of Oatmeal

时间窗: day of taste testing

Overall liking of oatmeal with a 9-point hedonic rating scale instrument (whereby 0 = dislike extremely and 9 = like extremely )

次要结局

  • Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Apple Crisp(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Apple Crisp(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Tea(Day of taste testings)
  • Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Oatmeal(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Plus Spice Recipe of Tea(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Full Sugar Recipe of Tea(day of taste testing)
  • Ranking of Reduced Sugar Recipe of Oatmeal(day of taste testing)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验