Behavioral Treatment for Children With Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Conduct Disorder

Interventions: Behavioral: Reward-Emphasized Treatment
Behavioral: Standard Treatment

Registration Number: NCT01362946

Lead Sponsor: Florida International University

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to modify behavior therapy so that it is optimized for children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits by emphasizing reward components and de-emphasizing punishment components.

Detailed Description: Several studies have demonstrated that standard behavioral treatments do not appear to be sufficient for children with conduct problems (CP) and callous-unemotional (CU) traits. Other research suggests that children with CPCU are less responsive to punishments as evaluated using controlled laboratory tasks. Based on these two sets of findings, it was hypothesized that behavioral treatment modified to emphasize reward and de-emphasize punishments would be advantageous when used to treat children with CPCU. This hypothesis was tested in a treatment development study that had three phases. During phase 1, which occurred in 2010, the intervention was planned and treatment procedures and manuals were developed. During phase 2, which occurred in 2011, a pilot study was conducted in which the intervention was tested in an iterative manner in a group of 12 children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. In phase 3, a larger trial was conducted using a cross over design, with one-half of participants getting standard behavioral treatment for four weeks followed by modified behavioral treatment for four weeks and remaining participants receiving treatments in the reverse order.Treatments were evaluated using parent ratings, counselor ratings, and frequency counts of behavior during treatments.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 48

Inclusion Criteria

Clinical diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder
Ages 7 to 12 years old
t-score of 65 or above on CU scale of Antisocial Process Screening Device as rated by parents or teacher
at least parent/caregiver fluent in English
able to participate in vigorous outdoor activities
parent/caregiver agreement to keep psychoactive medication treatment constant throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria

Full scale intelligence quotient (IQ) of less than 75
medical conditions that contra-indicate participation in treatment
current or past clinical diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, sexual disorder, organic mental disorder, or eating disorder
lack of functional impairment
current or past seizures or other neurological disorders

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Reward-Emphasized treatment	Reward-Emphasized Treatment	This treatment consisted of behavior therapy modified to match the unique learning styles of children with CPCU. This was accomplished by emphasizing rewards and de-emphasizing punishments. This treatment was administered using a summer treatment program.
Standard treatment	Standard Treatment	This treatment consisted of standard behavior therapy, in which reward and punishment components were used in a balanced manner, as is typically done in outpatient settings. This treatment was administered using a summer treatment program.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Negative Verbalizations	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of negative verbalizations, defined as verbal abuse to staff, teasing peers, and swearing. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Conduct Problems	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of conduct problems, defined as lying, stealing, intentional destruction of property, and intentional aggression. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Complaining	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of complaining. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Interruption	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of interrupting. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Noncompliance	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of noncompliance. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Rule Violations	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of rule violations. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Positive Peer Behavior	Weekly	Counselors recorded each instance of positive behavior with peers, defined as helping, sharing and ignoring teasing. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Minutes in Time Out	Weekly	Counselors recorded the total number of minutes children were in Time Out due to intentional aggression, intentional destruction of property, or repeated noncompliance. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Number of Time Outs	Weekly	Counselors recorded the total number of Time Outs children served due to intentional aggression, intentional destruction of property, or repeated noncompliance. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.
Minutes of Physical Management	Weekly	Counselors recorded the total number of minutes children had to be physically managed due to behavior dangerous to themselves or others. The average number per day was computed for each week of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
WPRF Rule Following Problems - Parent	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week parents rated each child's rule following problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.
WPRF Overall Problems - Counselor	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week counselors rated each child's overall problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.
WPRF Overall Problems - Parent	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week parents rated each child's overall problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.
How Much Did Your Child Benefit From Treatment?	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "How much did your child benefit from this treatment?". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much").
How Much Did You (the Parent) Benefit From Treatment?	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "How much did you benefit from this treatment?". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much").
How Much Did Your Child Enjoy the Treatment?	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "How much did your child this treatment?". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much").
Would You Send Your Child to This Treatment Again?	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "Would you send your child to this treatment if you could do it over again?". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("no definitely") to 4 ("yes definitely").
Recommend Treatment?	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "Would you recommend this treatment to other parents?". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("no definitely") to 4 ("yes definitely").
Overall Satisfaction	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "Please rate your overall satisfaction with this treatment as compared with other treatment services your child has received". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("much less satisfied with this program") to 4 ("much more satisfied with this program").
Overall Effectiveness	End of each treatment, at weeks 4 and 8	At the end of each treatment block parents rated their overall satisfaction with the treatment provided to their child. This item was phrased as follows: "Please rate how effective this treatment was in changing your child as compared with other treatment services your child has received". This item was rated using a Likert scale that ranged from 0 ("this treatment much less effective") to 4 ("this treatment much more effective").
Overall Treatment Recommendation - Counselor	End of all treatment, at week 8	At end end of both treatment blocks, counselors sorted children into one of four treatment response groups: (1) responded best to standard behavior therapy; (2) responded best to modified behavior therapy; (3) responded well to both treatments; (4) did not respond to either treatment
Overall Treatment Recommendation - Parent	End of all treatment, at week 8	At end end of both treatment blocks, parents selected which treatment they though was best for their child - standard behavioral treatment or modified behavioral treatment
IOWA Inattentive/Overactive Scale - Counselor	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week counselors rated each child's overall inattentive-overactive-impulsive behavior during the week. Rating were completed using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). Items were summed to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 0 to 15.
IOWA Inattentive/Overactive Scale - Parent	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week parents rated each child's overall inattentive-overactive-impulsive behavior during the week. Rating were completed using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). Items were summed to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 0 to 15.
IOWA Oppositional-defiant Scale - Counselor	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week counselors rated each child's overall oppositional-defiant behavior during the week. Rating were completed using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). Items were summed to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 0 to 15.
IOWA Oppositional-defiant Scale - Parent	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week parents rated each child's overall oppositional-defiant behavior during the week. Rating were completed using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). Items were summed to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 0 to 15.
WPRF Serious Conduct Problems Scale - Counselor	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week counselors rated each child's serious conduct problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.
WPRF Serious Conduct Problems Scale - Parent	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week parents rated each child's serious conduct problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.
WPRF Rule Following Problems - Counselor	Weekly	At the end of each treatment week counselors rated each child's rule following problems during the week. Rating were completed on the Weekly Problem Rating Form (Haas et al, 2011) using Likert scales that ranged from 1 ("no problem") to 7 ("serious problem"). Items were averaged to compute a scale score with a theoretical range of 1 to 7, with high scores indicating more serious problems.