A study to compare the effectiveness and pain associated with the use of normal irrigation and new irrigation HEBP in root canal treatment of adult permanent teeth

Not Applicable

• Registration Number: CTRI/2021/03/032370
• Lead Sponsor: Dr Janhvi Samir Parekh

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 24 November 2021

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) category I and category II adult patients aged between 18-45 years.

ii) Adult permanent asymptomatic non vital teeth requiring endodontic treatment

iii) Teeth whose non vitality is confirmed by Electric pulp tester (EPT) and thermal sensitivity testing.

iv) Feasibility of isolating the tooth with rubber dam with or without endodontic build up.

v) Vertucci type I and type IV root canal anatomy shall be taken for this study

vi) Subjects with the ability to understand the consent forms and the pain record scales.

Exclusion Criteria

Non vital tooth with periapical lesion

ii) Patients with preoperative pain (pain ranging for 1-10 on a numerical rating scale)

iii) Patients who have taken Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or any other analgesic for pain within last 4-8 hours

iv) Teeth with calcified root canals

v) Periodontally compromised teeth

vi) Teeth with complex root canal anatomy

vii) Patient not willing to give consent for the study

viii) Violation of the apical constriction during cleaning and shaping

ix) Patients with known allergy to the materials used in the study

x) Patient not reporting for follow up

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified