Comparison of Procedural Sedation With Propofol and Dexmedetomidine During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Phase 4

Completed

• Conditions: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Procedural Sedation
• Interventions: Drug: Propofol; Drug: Dexmedetomidine

• Registration Number: NCT03747432
• Lead Sponsor: University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Brief Summary

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world, affecting 3,9% of population over 70 years of age. If untreated it carries a poor prognosis, leading to heart failure and death in 2 years after first symptom presentation. Treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis is surgical aortic valve replacement. A new treatment option for severe aortic stenosis emerged in the last decade - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This minimally invasive method was formerly reserved for high risk patients deemed unfit for surgical aortic valve replacement. Increasing use throughout the developed world and recent studies have established TAVR as a safe and viable treatment option also for intermediate-risk patients. TAVR not only enables a less aggressive surgical approach, but also a less invasive type of anaesthesia. Anaesthesiologists are trying to modify the type of anaesthesia in the way of minimally invasive approach, aiming to improve the overall outcome.

TAVR can be performed under general anaesthesia or procedural sedation (PS). From the start, TAVR was performed solely under general anaesthesia. Over time the procedure became routine and the anaesthesiologists started to commonly decide for PS. Many US and European retrospective studies have established PS to be a safe and compelling method of anaesthetic care for TAVR procedures with a favorable perioperative course, less complications, shorter intensive care unit and in-hospital stay and lower early mortality, when performed by an experienced anaesthesia team. There are many anaesthesia agents currently accepted for PS in everyday anaesthesia practice. Presently, reliable data from studies comparing different agents for PS for TAVR procedures is scarce. Most of it comes from retrospective nonrandomized trials. Propofol is a popular anaesthetic agent for PS. According to current studies, it is a safe anaesthetic agent with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with quite low incidence of side effects. In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been commonly used for PS having analgesic properties inclusive of its anaesthetic properties. In addition, dexmedetomidine is associated with a lesser degree of respiratory depression as to other anaesthetic agents. Patient comfort is also believed to be improved with dexmedetomidine. Studies comparing outcomes of PS with propofol versus dexmedetomidine for different non-cardiac and interventional procedures showed benefits of dexmedetomidine, owing to its analgesic properties and preferable respiratory parameters.

The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR under PS with dexmedetomidine against those undergoing TAVR under PS with propofol. With the results the investigators aim to aid in defining the optimal anaesthetic agent for PS for TAVR and possibly other interventional cardiology procedures.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2018-11-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-11-19
• Study First Posted: 2018-11-20
• Study Start: 2019-01-15
• Primary Completion: 2021-06-30
• Study Completion: 2021-06-30
• Status Verified: 2023-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-05-08
• Last Update Posted: 2023-05-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 70

Inclusion Criteria

• Admission to University Medical Centre Ljubljana cardiology ward for TAVR using transfemoral approach
• Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
• Aged over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

• Disagreement to participate in the study
• Unable to voluntarily agree to participate in the study
• Unable to participate in Mini-Mental State Examination
• History of alcohol abuse
• Diagnosed progressive dementia
• History of cerebrovascular insult

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Propofol	Propofol	Procedural sedation with propofol during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: 0,5-2,5 mg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)
Dexmedetomidine	Dexmedetomidine	Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: bolus of 0,5 mcg/kg during 10 minutes, then continuous infusion of 0,2-1 mcg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Effect of procedural sedation with propofol or dexmedetomidine on cognitive function of patients	3 days	The investigators will perform cognitive function testing (Mini-Mental State Examination Test) one day before the procedure (baseline result) and 48 hours after the procedure (assesing change from baseline result)
Effect of procedural sedation with propofol or dexmedetomidine on appearance of postoperative delirium	84 hours	The investigators will perform CAM-ICU delirium assesment method every 12 hours for 84 hours after the procedure, assesing appearance of postoperative delirium in the first 84 hours after the procedure

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UMC Ljubljana; 🇸🇮 Ljubljana, Slovenia