MedPath

Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy Effect on Hemodynamic Stability Using Opioid Free Anesthesia Induction

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Blood Pressure
Anesthesia, General
Analgesics, Opioid
Heart Rate
Interventions
Device: fiberoptic guided intubation
Device: direct conventional laryngoscopy
Registration Number
NCT06487988
Lead Sponsor
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma in adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does fiberoptic intubation cause less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction?

Detailed Description

Background: Intubation has always been linked to a transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate that could be deleterious in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Fiberoptic intubation, which is currently used for suspected difficult intubation, could cause less marked rise in blood pressure and heart rate. Furthermore, "opioid free anesthesia" has gained popularity lately to avoid opioid adverse effects ranging from respiratory depression, postoperative ileus, sedation, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention.

Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma.

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 90 (45 in each group) adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, will be recruited over 1 year of work. Patients will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The direct conventional laryngoscopy group performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade, and the fiberoptic guided intubation group.

Significance: Studies comparing hemodynamic stability using fiberoptic intubation versus direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia are limited. The present study will assess whether fiberoptic intubation causes less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia induction, which will benefit patients with normal airways.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I and II
  • Range age of 18-55 years' old
  • Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of cardiovascular diseases.

  • History of lung disease.

  • Hypertensive patient (BP> 140/90)

  • Patient taking medications that affect blood pressure and heart rate

  • Morbid obesity (BMI >30)

  • Severe GERD

  • Predicted difficult airway (Short TMD <6 cm, Upper li bite test grade III, Mallampati score

    >III)

  • Neck instability

  • Patient planned to receive rapid sequence intubation

  • Patient refusal to participate

  • History of difficult intubation/ ventilation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
The fiberoptic guided intubation groupfiberoptic guided intubationThe fiberoptic guided intubation will be performed.
The direct conventional laryngoscopy groupdirect conventional laryngoscopyThe direct conventional laryngoscopy group will be performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Blood pressurebaseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation

Blood pressure (mm Hg)

Heart ratebaseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation

Heart rate (bpm)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
incidence of upper airway traumaduring intubation

incidence of upper airway trauma (Yes or No)

time needed for intubationbetween face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes

time (between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes)

incidence of postoperative sore throatafter 24 hrs

Sore throat pain (0-10)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Christian Rouphael

🇱🇧

Beirut, Lebanon

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath