Neurophysiology of Ankle Instability
- Conditions
- Ankle Injuries
- Interventions
- Other: Physical Rehabilitation
- Registration Number
- NCT06576687
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Nebraska
- Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between subgroups of chronic ankle instability (CAI) to allow for the development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes. The main questions are:1) determine the differences among CAI subgroups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, 2) determine the differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between chronic ankle instability subgroups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and 3) determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups.
- Detailed Description
Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common debilitating orthopedic condition that disrupts physical function and decreases quality of life. Chronic ankle instability is heterogenous and can manifest as mechanical ligamentous laxity, perceived disability often referred to as functional instability, or a combination of the two. However, clinicians and researchers most often combine all chronic ankle instability patients without considering these subgroups, which may account for the poor recovery and recurrent nature of this pathology. Neurocognitive and neurophysiologic discrepancies may explain the different subgroups observed in this population, however, technological limitations have previously limited this assessment. The objective of this research is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between subgroups of CAI to allow for development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes. To accomplish this, the aims of this study are: 1) determine the differences among CAI subgroups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, 2) determine differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between CAI subgroups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and 3) determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups. This study hypothesizes functional performance will be similar between subgroups during a traditional side-hop test, but those with functional instability without mechanical laxity will perform worse during a choice-reaction hop test compared to those with mechanical ankle instability. It also hypothesizes individuals with functional ankle instability will demonstrate greater cortical activation during the research tasks, and after a 4-week balance training protocol compared to individuals with mechanical ankle instability. To assess these aims, participants with CAI who present with functional ankle instability as well as with mechanical ankle instability will perform a series of hop tests, single limb balance test, a force control test, a neurocognitive assessment, and 4-weeks of neurocognitive balance training. Time to complete each of the hop tests, cortical activation during the balance and force control tasks, and neurocognitive performance will be assessed to determine differences in performance and neurological function among subgroups of CAI. Therefore, the long-term objective of this research is to determine the underlying neurologic, neurophysiologic, and motor control mechanisms underpinning CAI to improve evidence-based decision making across patients with chronic ankle instability.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 42
-
All participants must be physically active (participation in at least 90 total minutes of activity/week including running, walking, lifting weights, or playing a sport, etc.)
-
Healthy controls:
- no history of lateral ankle sprain
- no complaints of their ankle giving way
- a Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score greater than 28
-
Coper participants (participants coping with ankle problems:
- a history of lateral ankle sprain, but no episodes of giving way in previous 12 months
- CAIT score greater than 28
-
Chronic ankle instability (CAI):
- history of ankle sprain
- two or more episodes of ankle giving way in previous 12 months
- CAIT score less than 25
- History of lower extremity surgery or fracture
- Current signs or symptoms of a joint sprain in the lower extremity
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosis of a vestibular disorder
- Diagnosis of a nerve or connective tissue disorder
- Significant history of condition that impaired cognitive function such as concussion or learning disability
- Currently taking medications that may affect cognitive function such as narcotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety agents, or stimulants
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Balance Training Physical Rehabilitation Exercises include (1) single-limb hops to stabilization, (2) hop to stabilization and reach, (3) unanticipated hop to stabilization, (4) single-limb stance activities, and (5) continuous choice-reaction hopping.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Choice-reaction hop test Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Participants hop on a mat medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times, using visual cues to direct their movement to one of two squares on each side. This is measured in time, greater times equals worse performance.
Side-hop test Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Amount of time it takes to hop medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times. This is measured in time, greater times equals worse performance.
Inversion-eversion force control Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Test to determine force control accuracy at 50% maximal contraction for eversion and inversion. Outcome measure is non-linear analysis Lyapunov exponent (LyE) which measures to the quality, or the natural, inherent fluctuations in movement. Greater values indicate reduced neuromuscular control.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sport (FAAM-Sport) Scale Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sport Scale; scored as a percentage min=0%, maximum=100%, higher scores are a better outcome.
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, scored out of 30, min=0, maximum=30, higher scores are a better outcome.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) Scale Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scale; scored as a percentage min=0%, maximum=100%, higher scores are a better outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Nebraska-Omaha, Biomechanics Research Building
🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States