difference between post operative analgesic effect of caudal epidural injection of ropivacaine and fentanyl with ropivacaine alone in lumbo- sacral spine surgery.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: G628- Other specified polyneuropathies
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/01/039415
- Lead Sponsor
- AIIMS Raipur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patients scheduled for lumbosacral spine surgery.
2.Patients age between 18 years to 65years.
3.Patient with ASA grade 1 and 2 with both the sexes.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patient not willing for consent
2.Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes or asthma.
3.Patients with preoperative opioid consumption.
4.Patients who underwent a previous lumber spine surgery.
5.Patients with contraindication to regional anaesthesia.
6.Patients with hypersensitive to ropivacaine and fentanyl.
7.Any lumbosacral anomaly
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method i.To evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of caudal epidural injection of ropivacaine and fentanyl with ropivacaine postoperatively (in terms of reduction in requirement of rescue analgesia). <br/ ><br>ii.To assess the duration and quality of analgesia (in term of first rescue analgesia and VAS score) <br/ ><br>iii.To see the incidence of any adverse effects. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1year 6 months <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ii.To assess the duration and quality of analgesia (in term of first rescue analgesia and VAS score) <br/ ><br>iii.To see the incidence of any adverse effects.Timepoint: 1YEAR 6MONTHS