Exercise Intensity Matters in Stroke Rehabilitation
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Behavioral: 12 weeks of Moderate-Intensity Continuous TrainingBehavioral: 12 weeks of High-intensity Interval Training
- Registration Number
- NCT03614585
- Lead Sponsor
- McGill University
- Brief Summary
The main objective of this multi-site project is to compare the effects of 12 weeks of HIIT vs. MICT on brain plasticity. The effects of HIIT vs. MICT on cardiovascular health, psychosocial predictors of physical activity and motor function will also be compared. HIIT and MICT will be delivered through a whole-body exercise paradigm using a recumbent stepper that requires arm and leg forces. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline (T0, 0 weeks), at the end of the intervention (T1, 12 weeks) and at 8-week follow-up (T2, 20 weeks).
- Detailed Description
Background: Stroke is a major health issue in Canada, with 405,000 Canadians currently living with stroke. Exercise is an important component of stroke rehabilitation that can result in improved function and health. Traditionally, exercise rehabilitation programs for stroke employ moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) protocols that are typically sustained for 20-30 minutes. The continuous nature of this form of training however, even at moderate intensities, is challenging for many individuals with stroke to sustain due to neuromotor impairments and poor exercise capacity. High-intensity exercise, when delivered in short interval bursts (i.e. high-intensity interval training, HIIT), may be a feasible alternative that allows higher intensities to be achieved during exercise. This is important because intensity of training is the critical factor in promoting changes in neuroplasticity and cardiovascular health, the two most important aspects of recovery and secondary prevention after stroke. Interventions implemented earlier following stroke are generally viewed to yield greater benefits, but high intensity exercise may also promote neuroplasticity and optimize cardiovascular health in later stages of recovery. Furthermore, determining if HIIT is viewed to be motivating and enjoyable for individuals post-stroke can provide insight into the sustainability of this intervention.
Objective: To compare the effects of 12 weeks of HIIT and MICT on neuroplasticity, cardiovascular health and psychosocial predictors of physical activity in individuals with chronic stroke.
Design: Participants will be recruited from two research sites and randomly allocated into HIIT or MICT. Participants will be assessed before and after the training period, and at an 8-week follow-up.
Outcomes: 1) The investigators will assess: Neuroplasticity: by measuring markers of corticospinal excitability at rest and in response to a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol applied over the primary motor cortex (M1); 2) Cardiovascular health: by measuring cardiorespiratory fitness, resting blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and waist-hip ratio; 3) Psychosocial predictors of physical activity: by measuring exercise motivation and enjoyment.
Methods: Neuroplasticity: motor evoked potentials amplitude, intracortical facilitation and short-intracortical inhibition on the lesioned and unlesioned upper limb M1 area at rest and in response to continuous theta-burst will be measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation; Cardiovascular health: cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured with a graded exercise test, resting blood pressure with an automated blood pressure monitor and arterial stiffness using applanation tonometry. Exercise motivation and enjoyment will be assessed with the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale and the Behavioral Regulation Exercise Questionnaire-3, respectively.
Expected results: Both HIIT and MICT will result in improvements in outcomes of neuroplasticity and cardiovascular health. However, improvements with HIIT will be greater and will last longer. Participants will rate HIIT as enjoyable as MICT, and motivation for exercise will increase similarly after both interventions.
Impact: HIIT is a promising, time-efficient, and potentially more effective alternative to traditional MICT protocols that could offer an opportunity for greater improvement in motor recovery and cardiovascular health in people living with stroke.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- 6-60 months following first-ever, single stroke confirmed by MRI/CT
- Living in the community and able to independently walk at least 10 meters (assistive devices permitted, as this is representative of many people who regain some walking ability following stroke but commonly with some adaptation)
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment score >20 (individuals with this score are capable to follow exercise instructions)
- Significant disability as determined by modified Rankin scale score <2
- Stroke of non-cardiogenic origin or tumor
- Actively engaged in stroke rehabilitation services or a structured exercise program besides the one provided in the study
- Class C or D American Heart Association Risk Criteria
- Other neurological or musculoskeletal co-morbidities that preclude exercise participation
- Pain which is worsened with exercise
- Cognitive, communication, or behavioral issues that would limit safe exercise participation
- Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Moderate-intensity continuous training 12 weeks of Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Intensity will be determined using a combination of heart rate reserve (HRR, calculated as HRR= \[max HR - resting HR\] x \[% training\] + \[resting HR\]) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). The MICT protocol will be increased using a progression schedule previously used (initial intensity at 40% HRR (RPE=9-11), and progressed by 10% HRR every 4 weeks up to 60% HRR (RPE=13-14) will be maintained until the end of the intervention). A 3-minute warm-up and 2-minute cool-down will be performed at 30% HRR (RPE=9-11). The total duration of MICT, including warm-up and cool-down, will be 35 minutes. High-intensity interval training 12 weeks of High-intensity Interval Training Intensity will be determined using a combination of heart rate reserve (HRR, calculated as HRR= \[max HR - resting HR\] x \[% training\] + \[resting HR\]) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). The protocol will involve 10 60-second intervals of high intensity interspersed with 9 60-second low-intensity intervals. The initial high intensity intervals will start at 80% of the HRR (RPE=14-17) and progress by 10% every 4 weeks. Low intensity intervals will be performed at 30% of HRR (RPE=9-11). Three-minute warm-up and 2-minute cool-down periods will be performed at 30% of HRR. Total HIIT time including warm-up and cool-down is 24 minutes.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cortico-spinal excitability 12 weeks Single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diastolic resting blood pressure 12 weeks Supine resting blood pressure.
Arterial stiffness 12 weeks Central pulse wave velocity.
Intra-cortical inhibition 12 weeks Paired-pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol.
Cardiorespiratory fitness 12 weeks Maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during maximum physical effort.
Intra-cortical facilitation 12 weeks Paired-pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol.
Systolic resting blood pressure 12 weeks Supine resting blood pressure.
Waist-hip ratio 12 weeks Ratio of waist circumference measured at the level of the umbilicus, and hip circumference taken at the level of the greater trochanters.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Ontario Central South Stroke Network
🇨🇦Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Jewish Rehabiliation Hospital
🇨🇦Laval, Quebec, Canada