Attention and Achievement: A Mind Wandering Investigation
- Conditions
- Attention Disturbances
- Interventions
- Behavioral: mind-wandering interventionBehavioral: mind-wandering comparison
- Registration Number
- NCT05296252
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Houston
- Brief Summary
This study assesses the impact of mind-wandering on reading and math.
- Detailed Description
This study assesses the impact of mind-wandering on reading and math. Specifically 120 middle school student participants will receive descriptive measures (of achievement, attention and related factors including mind-wandering), and will receive a brief (\~30 min) lesson in reading and math (order counterbalanced). Participants will receive a brief pre-test, the lesson, and then a post-test on the reading and math outcomes. 75% of the participants will receive a brief manipulation that sets up the influence of mind-wandering, as well as redirects when probe-caught mind-wandering occurs. The remaining participants will receive only redirects, and only randomly. Among participants to receive the mind-wandering manipulation, an equal number will receive this only for reading, only for math, and for both reading and math.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 53
- enrollment in schools where we have permission to conduct the study
- students known to be enrolled in separate curricula (e.g., life-skills classes)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mind Wandering Intervention mind-wandering intervention 75% of participants will receive proactive and reactive mind-wandering information and redirection. Mind Wandering Comparison mind-wandering comparison 25% of participants will receive only mind-wandering redirection, but only at random times.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Investigator Developed Items Derived From Math Content Being Taught adminstered one time immediately following the single math learning session on day 1 Participants will answer multiple choice questions regarding the math material being taught, and the key index will the raw score number correct. The investigators call the scale "Circles" (after the content being taught), and the possible score range will be 0 (min) to 24 (max), with higher scores meaning better comprehension of the material.
Investigator Developed Items Derived From Reading Content Being Taught administered one time immediately following the single reading learning session on day 1 Participants will answer multiple choice questions regarding the reading material being taught, and the key index will the raw score number correct. The investigators call the scale "Sleep and Dreams" (after the content the participant is reading about), and the possible score range will be 0 (min) to 24 (max), with higher scores meaning better comprehension of the material.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Investigator Developed Probe-Caught Mind-Wandering On 12 occasions interspersed during each of the math and reading learning sessions, on day 1 only. During the learning (of the reading and math content), participants are prompted on several occasions as to whether their mind was wandering during the lesson. This is a single item multiple/choice scale (called Probe-Caught Mind Wandering), with the range being 0 (min) to 12 (max), with lower scores indicating the better outcome (less mind wandering)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States