Comparison of Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective IPTW-Adjusted Analysis

Study Background Esophageal cancer is a common and rapidly progressing malignancy. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are the main treatments. Paclitaxel is a widely used chemotherapy drug, but conventional paclitaxel requires solvents that can cause allergic reactions and other side effects.

Albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-Paclitaxel) is a newer formulation that uses albumin nanoparticles to deliver the drug. This design reduces the need for solvents, improves drug distribution, may enhance effectiveness, and potentially lowers some side effects.

Study Purpose The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Nab-Paclitaxel versus standard Paclitaxel in neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer, helping clinicians choose the most suitable regimen while providing patients with understandable treatment information.

Study Design Patient population: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer

Treatment groups:

Nab-Paclitaxel + platinum-based chemotherapy Standard Paclitaxel + platinum-based chemotherapy

Study type: Retrospective analysis (examining completed patient data)

Key outcomes evaluated: Pathological response (TRS / PCR): Tumor shrinkage before surgery Surgical outcomes: e.g., R0 resection rate, Safety and side effects

Inclusion criteria: Pathologically confirmed ESCC, baseline assessment indicating resectable or potentially resectable disease, and receipt of at least one cycle of dual-agent chemotherapy (taxane + platinum) combined with immunotherapy (PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor).

Exclusion criteria: Presence of other untreated malignancies, receipt of other neoadjuvant treatments (such as chemotherapy alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or combined chemoradiotherapy-immunotherapy regimens), incomplete data, or unwillingness to participate in follow-up.