CTRI/2023/02/049457已完成未知
Comparison of Blind Oro-Tracheal Intubation through LMA Blockbuster and LMA Protector - A Prospective Randomized Study
Pt.B.D.Sharma University of Health Sciences PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana0 个研究点目标入组 90 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 90
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •90 patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.
排除标准
- •Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, mouth opening <2.5cms, body mass index >30kg/m2, pregnancy, full stomach, anticipated difficult airway and any patient who refuses to participate in the study will be excluded from the study.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
A comparison of blind intubarion with LMA Blockbuster and I GelCTRI/2021/09/036798Government Institute of Medical sciences
已完成
不适用
Comparative study of orotracheal intubation through Air Q laryngeal mask airway: Blind versus fiberoptic guided during general anesthesiaACTRN12614000405617faculty of medicine benisuef university100
招募中
不适用
Comparison of success rates between two devices called AIR Q and LMA Blockbuster which are used to pass a tube into the wind pipe and secure the airway as well as ensure normal breathing in patients taken for surgery and undergoing general anesthesiaCTRI/2019/10/021623All India Institute of Medical Sciences
已完成
不适用
Evaluation of two different methods of video-laryngoscopyCTRI/2018/12/016611niversity College of Medical Sciences50
尚未招募
2 期
comparing intubation in trachea with two devices in patients with snoring who are risk for difficult intubation using an assessing scoreCTRI/2024/01/061055Hamadard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research