Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/JPRN-UMIN000022153
JPRN-UMIN000022153
Not yet recruiting
未知

A prospective randomized study of the comparison intravesical BCG therapy with intravesical chemotherapy using pirarubicin for non muscle invasive bladder cancer with intermediate recurrent risk - The comparison intravesical BCG therapy with intravesical chemotherapy using pirarubicin in NMIBC patients

Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Urology0 sites116 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2016
ConditionsBladder Cancer

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Sponsor
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Urology
Enrollment
116
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
September 1, 2016
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Department of Urology

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Active double cancer (including upper urinary tract carcinoma and prostate carcinoma) 2\. CIS, High grade or MIBC confirmed TURBT 3\. Previously received BCG intravesical chemotherapy or intravesical chemotherapy within 1 year 4\. Serious drug hypersensitivity 5\. Active tuberculosis defined by T spot 6\. Severe dysfuction of main organs, CHF with NYHA III or IV, asparates aminotransferase and alanine amonotransferase below 3 times as normal values, Hb A1c \>\= 8\.0% 7\. Serious viral and bacterial infection 8\. Patients the investigators considered to be inappropriate for this study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
The study to show factors affecting early recovery after surgery including fluid management
CTRI/2020/03/024318DrSandeep Sahu
Terminated
Not Applicable
A prospective randomized study of corticosteroid withdrawal in low-risk kidney transplant recipient selected by immune monitoring methodNot Applicable
KCT0000664Samsung Medical Center236
Completed
Phase 4
Real-time USG thoracic epidural catheter insertion comparing to landmark techniqueThoracic epidural catheter insertion is a challenging procedure, and previous pieces of evidence together with our experience found that using land-mark technique had a highly failure rateThoracic Epidural Analgesia, Postoperative pain, Ultrasound guidance, Land-mark Technique, Regional Analgesia, Neuraxial Block
TCTR20200522002Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University96
Completed
Phase 3
comparative between real-time ultrasound-guided and landmark for thoracic epidural placementAge greater than or equal to 65-years-old Schedule for elective major abdominal and thoracic surgeryPlan to insert a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative pain controlThoracic epidural placementelderlyreal-time ultrasound-assisted
TCTR20220913004Faculty of medicine, Prince of Songkla university76
Completed
Phase 3
Prospective randomized study for the comparision of two different reconstructive regarding the incidence of pancreatic fistula and other complications following partial pancreaticoduodenectomyC25.0Head of pancreas
DRKS00000419niversitätsklinikum FreiburgAbteilung Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie116