Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback Devices

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Cardiac Arrest
• Interventions: Device: Standard BLS; Device: The CPREazy; Device: TrueCPR; Device: The CPR PRO APP; Device: The CardioPump

• Registration Number: NCT02294721
• Lead Sponsor: International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare four different CPR feedback devices to standard BLS in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, the investigators hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2014-11
• Study Start: 2014-11
• Study First Submitted: 2014-11-16
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-11-16
• Last Update Submitted: 2014-11-16
• Study First Posted: 2014-11-19
• Last Update Posted: 2014-11-19
• Primary Completion: 2014-12
• Study Completion: 2014-12

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 200

Inclusion Criteria

• give voluntary consent to participate in the study
• medical profession (nurses)

Exclusion Criteria

• not meet the above criteria
• wrist or low back diseases

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
With feedback	The CardioPump	Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.
With feedback	The CPR PRO APP	Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.
Without feedback	Standard BLS	Participants compress the chest of the manikin without CPR feedback device
With feedback	The CPREazy	Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.
With feedback	TrueCPR	Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Effective compressions	1 day	Effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Chest compression depth	1 day	To measure chest compression depth during 8 minutes. Chest compression depth will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer
Chest compression rate	1 day	To measure the chest compression rate during 8 minutes. Chest compression rate will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer
effective compressions ratio	1day	effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions \[%\] multiplied by flow time \[%\]
Flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed	1 day	flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.
absolute hands-off time	1 day	absolute hands-off time (HOT) was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation
VAS (visual analogue scale)	1 day	after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how challenging they had experienced standard BLS or resuscitation which the respective feedback device. answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (most difficult = 1 to easiest = 10)
Prefered CPR device	1 day	after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how chellenging whitch method they would preferred. answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (lower preferred = 1 to most preferred = 10)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education; 🇵🇱 Warsaw, Masovia, Poland