Clinical Trial of a Mouth and Throat Rinse for the Treatment of Acute Sore Throat
- Conditions
- Sore-throatUpper Respiratory Infection
- Interventions
- Device: Verum (WO 6607)Device: Placebo (WO 6608)
- Registration Number
- NCT06244615
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to confirm the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the Mouth and Throat Rinse in adult participants with acute sore throat (upper respiratory tract infection e.g., pharyngitis/laryngitis) compared to placebo.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 154
- Subjects having clinical signs and symptoms of recent (less than 48 h) acute sore throat (upper respiratory tract infection) without signs of lower respiratory tract infection (total severity score for throat irritation baseline value ≥ 4).
- Centor Score of 0 to 3 points at screening.
- Female and male subjects with 18-75 years of age.
- Known allergy to any of the components in the investigational product (Placebo or Verum) (i.e. SLS).
- Centor Score of 4 points at screening.
- Presence of exanthema.
- Presence of oral mucosal plaques e.g., soor.
- Presence of bacterial infection of the upper respiratory tract (confirmed by rapid screening test).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Verum mouth and throat rinse Verum (WO 6607) Formulation containing WO 6607 for oral administration (rinse and gargle). Placebo mouth and throat rinse Placebo (WO 6608) Formulation containing WO 6608 for oral administration (rinse and gargle).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in total severity score of throat irritation for subjective and objective symptoms during the clinical investigation (comparison between verum and placebo) Day 1 vs Day 4 A total severity score for throat irritation will be calculated at each visit as the sum of the subjective and objective symptoms. Each of the four criteria on a scale from 0 to 4:
1. soreness, 2. difficulty swallowing (rated by the subject), 3. mucosal swelling of the throat and 4. oropharyngeal color (erythema) (assessed by the investigator)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo with respect to the subjective symtoms of throat soreness and difficulty swallowing Day 1 vs. Day 7±1 and Day 1 vs. Day 14±1 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Change Day 1 to Day 7±1 and Day 1 to Day 14±1 for each subjective symptom of throat soreness and difficulty swallowing (rated by the subject on a scale from 0 to 4)Global judgement of efficacy by the investigator Day 1 vs. Day 2, Day 1 vs. Day 7, Day 1 vs. Day 14 The global judgement of efficacy (mucous swelling and oropharyngeal color (erythema)) will be assessed according to the following scale: 0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe, 4= very severe
Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the recovery time Day 1 vs. Day 7 and Day 1 vs. Day 14 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Recovery time is defined as the time to improvement in total severity score of throat irritation value to ≤ 4, provided the score for each criterion is not \> 1Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the presence of Metapneumovirus and Bocavirus Day 1 vs. Day 4 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Combined nasal and oropharyngeal swab sampling for PCR detection of viruses without CT values reported for Metapneumovirus and BocavirusEvaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo by analysing the detection of viruses Day 1 vs. Day 2,Day 1 vs. Day 4, Day 1 vs. Day 7 and Day 1 vs. Day 14 Combined nasal and oropharyngeal swab sampling for PCR detection of viruses including CT values reported for: Adenovirus, Coronaviruses including OC43, NL63, 229E and SARS-CoV-2, Influenza virus A and B, Parainfluenza virus 1-4, Rhinovirus, RSV) in adult subjects with acute sore throat (upper respiratory tract infection e.g., pharyngitis/laryngitis) compared to Placebo (Day 1 vs. Day 2 and Day 1 vs. Day 4)
Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the proportion of rebound after treatment phase Day 1 vs. Day 7 and Day 1 vs. Day 14 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Number of patients (%) with a rebound after treatment phase. Rebound is defined as worsening in total severity score of throat irritation valueEvaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the need for further medical intervention or treatments such as rescue therapy or pain medication Day 1 vs. Day 7 and Day 1 vs. Day 14 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Number of patients with the need for further medical intervention or treatments such as rescue therapy or pain medicationGlobal judgement of efficacy by the patient Day 1 vs. Day 2, Day 1 vs. Day 7, Day 1 vs. Day 14 The global judgement of efficacy (throat soreness and difficulty swallowing) will be assessed according to the severity score: 0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe, 4= very severe
Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the objective symptoms of mucous swelling and oropharyngeal color (erythema) Day 1 vs. Day 7±1 and Day 1 vs. Day 14±1 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Change Day 1 to Day 7±1 and Day 1 to Day 14±1 for each objective symptom of mucous swelling, oropharyngeal color (erythema) (assessed by the investigator on a scale from 0 to 4)Evaluate the efficacy of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse compared to Placebo regarding the proportion of expansion of the symptoms (e.g., subsequent bronchitis) Day 1 vs. Day 7 and Day 1 vs. Day 14 Comparison between Verum and Placebo:
Number of patients in percent (%) having an expansion of the symptoms (e.g., subsequent bronchitis)Evaluate the safety of the Verum Mouth and Throat Rinse in adult subjects with acute sore throat (upper respiratory tract infection e.g., pharyngitis/laryngitis) Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 7±1, Day 14±1 The safety will be assessed through adverse events
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Central City Clinical Hospital of Ivano-Frankivsk
🇺🇦Ivano-Frankivs'k, Ukraine