A Trial to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of FE 201836 for Nocturia Due to Nocturnal Polyuria in Adults
- Conditions
- Nocturia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03201419
- Lead Sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of different oral doses of FE 201836, with desmopressin as a benchmark, during 12 weeks of treatment for nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria in adults
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 302
- Adults ≥18 years of age (at the time of written consent)
- Medical history of, or subject reported nocturia symptoms during the 6 months prior to Visit 1
- ≥2 nocturnal voids (an average over 3 days) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
- The largest single voided volume must be ≥200 mL (at least 1 void ≥200 mL) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
- Nocturnal polyuria, defined as Nocturnal Polyuria index >33%, a ratio of Nocturnal Urine Volume in excess of 33% of total daily (24-hour) urine volume as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2
- ≥20% decrease in the nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) (that was recorded at Visit 2) as documented in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 3
-
Current diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)
-
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
-
Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO) or urine flow <5 mL/s, as confirmed by uroflowmetry upon suspicion during screening prior to Visit 2
-
Urinary incontinence defined as an average of >1 episode/day in the 3-day e-Diary prior to Visit 2 (occasional urge incontinence during daytime or at night on the way to void is not necessarily exclusionary)
-
Any pelvic or lower urinary tract surgery and/or radio therapy or previous pelvic irradiation within the past 6 months prior to Visit 1. Including e.g., transurethral resection for Bladder Outlet Obstruction or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, hysterectomy or female incontinence procedures
-
Genito-urinary tract pathology that can in the investigator's opinion be responsible for urgency or urinary incontinence e.g., symptomatic or recurrent urinary tract infections, interstitial cystitis, bladder-related pain, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, or stone in the bladder or urethra causing symptoms
-
A history of cancer with the last date of disease activity/presence of malignancy within the last 12 months prior to Visit 1, except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin
-
History of any neurological disease affecting bladder function or muscle strength (e.g., Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, spina bifida)
-
Habitual (fluid intake >3L per day) or psychogenic polydipsia
-
Uncontrolled hypertension, as judged by the investigator
-
Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, as judged by the investigator
-
Central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
-
Known history of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH) secretion
-
History of gastric retention
-
Suspicion or evidence of congestive heart failure, (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III, IV)
-
Hyponatraemia:
- Serum sodium level <135 mmol/L at Visit 1(re-tested, with results available within 7 days)
- Serum sodium level <130 mmol/L at Visit 3 (re-tested, with results available within 7 days)
-
Use of any prohibited therapy listed below:
- Current or former (within 3 months prior to screening) treatment with any other investigational medicinal product (IMP)
- Unstable electrostimulation or behavioural bladder training program less than 3 months prior to screening (stable electrostimulation or behavioural bladder training program started at least 3 months before screening are acceptable)
- Thiazide diuretics
- Antiarrhythmic agents
- V2-receptor antagonists/agonists (e.g., vaptans/desmopressin, vasopressin)
- Loperamide
- Botulinum toxin (cosmetic non-urological use is acceptable)
- Valproate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description FE 201836 500 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 500 μg oral solution and placebo orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), administered once daily FE 201836 500 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 500 μg oral solution and placebo orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), administered once daily FE 201836 350 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 350 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 350 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 350 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 250 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 250 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 250 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 250 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 150 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 150 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 150 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 150 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 100 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 100 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily Desmopressin 25 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Desmopressin Desmopressin 25 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (female subjects) FE 201836 100 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 100 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) FE 201836 FE 201836 50 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily FE 201836 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT FE 201836 50 μg oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo oral solution Placebo oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily Placebo (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo ODT Placebo oral solution and placebo ODT, administered once daily Desmopressin 25 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo oral solution Desmopressin 25 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (female subjects) Desmopressin 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Placebo oral solution Desmopressin 50 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (male subjects) Desmopressin 50 μg (Randomized Treatment Period) Desmopressin Desmopressin 50 μg ODT and placebo oral solution, administered once daily (male subjects)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning.
The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2, and 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval are presented in this endpoint.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning.
The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.
MMRM=Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements.
For all visit-specific results, the tables present the number of subjects with an observation of the endpoints in question at the specific visit. All secondary analyses are performed using the observed-case approach based on repeated measurements for all subjects in the ITT-RT population. That is, these secondary analyses are based on all subjects with at least one non-missing post-baseline observation (with a baseline value if relevant).Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning.
The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning.
The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 Nocturnal voids were defined as voids occuring from 5 minutes after bedtime until rising in the morning.
The number of nocturnal voids at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 1 Week 1 Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline.
Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% in the reduction mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.
The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 4 Week 4 Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline.
Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.
The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 8 Week 8 Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline.
Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.
The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids at Week 12 Week 12 Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline.
Adjusted visit-specific estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids are estimated using a baseline value of 2.
The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).Responder Rate in Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment During 12 weeks of treatment Defined as 50% reduction in nocturnal voids from baseline.
Estimated odds of at least 50% reduction in the aggregated mean number of nocturnal voids for a subject with 2 nocturnal voids at baseline are presented in this endpoint.
The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.
The estimated odd equals the probability of response divided by the probability of non-response; these odds may vary between 0 and infinity. For example, if the probability of responding is 80%, the odd of responding is 4, as it is 4 times more likely to respond (80%) then it is not to respond (20%).Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall quality of life (QoL) impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items.Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest t o highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Total Score at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Total Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Total Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). The NI Diary Total Scores are calculated by summing the 11 core items. Responses are scored from 0 to 4 (lowest to highest impact). The NI Diary Total is standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the mean over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Total Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint.
The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.Percentage of Nights With at Most One Nocturnal Void During 12 Weeks of Treatment During 12 weeks of treatment The percentages of nights during the treatment period with at most one nocturnal void are presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.Percentage of Nights With No Nocturnal Voids During 12 Weeks of Treatment During 12 weeks of treatment The percentages of nights during the treatment period with complete response, i.e. no nocturnal voids are presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean number of nocturnal voids equal to 2 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NI Diary Overall Impact Score are estimated using a baseline value of 40.Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score During 12 Weeks of Treatment Baseline, during 12 weeks of treatment The NI Diary is a 12-item questionnaire with 11 core items (Q1-Q11) and an overall QoL impact question (Q12). For the overall impact question (Q12), response options range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). The NI Diary Overall Impact Scores are standardized from 0 to 100 (lowest to highest impact).
The score at each visit was calculated as the average over the three consecutive 24 hour periods just prior to the respective visit. The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean NI Diary Overall Impact Score equal to 40 is presented in this endpoint.
The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 1 Week 1 The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 4 Week 4 The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 8 Week 8 The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Urinary Symptoms Scores at Week 12 Week 12 The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of changes in urinary symptoms. The PGI-I was scored from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Visit-specific PGI-I in urinary symptoms is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe).
Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe).
Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe).
Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in PGI-S Scores at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess patient's impression of disease severity. The PGI-S was scored from 1 (none) to 4 (severe).
Change from baseline in visit-specific PGI-S is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of PGI-S equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Hsu 5-point Likert Bother Scale at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The Hsu 5-point Likert Bother scale is a questionnaire designed to assess the subjective bothersomeness and functional disruptiveness of nocturia. The Hsu 5 point Likert Bother Scale was scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely).
Change from baseline in visit-specific Hsu Bother is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of Hsu Bother equal to 3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred.
The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred.
The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of FUSP at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred.
The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed.
Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Mean NUV in Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning.
The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).Change From Baseline in Mean NUV at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The NUV is defined as the total urine volume from 5 minutes after bedtime with the intention to sleep including the first void within 30 minutes of rising in the morning.
The NUV at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in NUV are estimated using a baseline value of 750 (mL).Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 4 Baseline, Week 4 The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia).
Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 8 Baseline, Week 8 The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia).
Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in ISI at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The ISI is a 7-item questionnaire which comprises of four 'sleep-related' items and three 'wake-related' items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale and the total score ranges from 0 to 28 (higher score suggests more severe insomnia).
Change from baseline in visit-specific ISI is presented in this endpoint.
Level estimated for baseline value of ISI equal to 15 is presented in this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of First Undisturbed Sleep Period (FUSP) at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occured.
The duration of FUSP at each visit was calculated as the average over the 3 consecutive 24-hour periods just prior to the respective visit. Adjusted visit-specific mean changes from baseline in FUSP are estimated using a baseline value of 180 (min).Change From Baseline in Aggregated Mean Duration of FUSP During 12 Weeks of Treatment Baseline, During 12 Weeks of Treatment The FUSP is defined as the time in minutes from the time of going to bed to the time of first nocturnal void, or time of awakening if no void occurred.
The visit-specific means were aggregated into a mean of current and preceding visits.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean duration of FUSP (minutes) equal to 180 is presented in this endpoint.
The 95% credibility interval (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of the posterior distribution) instead of confidence interval is presented for this endpoint.Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Diuresis Rate Profiles at Week 1 Baseline, Week 1 The nocturnal diuresis rate (mL/min) is calculated as the mean of the nocturnal diuresis for each of the three nights, with the single-night nocturnal diuresis calculated as the ratio of NUV to total time in bed.
Change from baseline in visit-specific mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) is presented.
Level estimated for baseline value of mean nocturnal diuresis (mL/min) equal to 1.3 is presented in this endpoint.
Trial Locations
- Locations (71)
Advanced Rx Clinical Research Group, Inc.
🇺🇸Westminster, California, United States
MCA Research - Partner
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Doctors Research Institute Corporation
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
UZ Antwerpen
🇧🇪Edegem, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
🇧🇪Gent, Belgium
Downtown Women's Health Care
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Clinical Research Consortium, an AMR company
🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Tri Valley Urology Medical Group
🇺🇸Murrieta, California, United States
Achieve Clinical Research, LLC
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
San Diego Clinical Trials
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Clinical Trials Research
🇺🇸Lincoln, California, United States
Coastal Clinical Research, an AMR company
🇺🇸Mobile, Alabama, United States
Ultra-Med Inc.
🇨🇦Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada
DIEX Recherche Quebec Inc.
🇨🇦Quebec, Canada
Clinical Research of South Florida
🇺🇸Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Genitourinary Surgical Consultants, P.C.
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Pharmax Research Clinic
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
American Health Network of Indiana, LLC
🇺🇸Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Pines Care Research Center, Inc
🇺🇸Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
HWC Women's Research Center
🇺🇸Englewood, Ohio, United States
PMG Research of Charleston, LLC
🇺🇸Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Ericksen Research & Development, LLC
🇺🇸Clinton, Utah, United States
Advanced Research Institute
🇺🇸Ogden, Utah, United States
SKDS Research Inc.
🇨🇦Newmarket, Canada
CHUS - Hôpital Fleurimont
🇨🇦Sherbrooke, Canada
Fakultni nemocnice Brno, Dept of Klinika nemoci plicnich a tuberkulozy
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
DIEX Recherche Sherbrooke Inc.
🇨🇦Sherbrooke, Canada
Milestone Research
🇨🇦London, Canada
Ferring Investigational Site
🇨🇦Toronto, Canada
Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
🇩🇪Emmendingen, Germany
Bagoly Egeszseghaz
🇭🇺Kecskemet, Hungary
SzSzB Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz, Josa Andras Oktatokorhaz Urologia
🇭🇺Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
Quality Clinical Research Center, Inc.
🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Women's Medical Research Group, LLC
🇺🇸Clearwater, Florida, United States
Sanitas Research
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
South Florida Medical Research
🇺🇸Aventura, Florida, United States
Finlay Medical Research Corp
🇺🇸Greenacres City, Florida, United States
Tampa Bay Medical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Clearwater, Florida, United States
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
🇺🇸DeLand, Florida, United States
Clinical Research Center of Florida
🇺🇸Pompano Beach, Florida, United States
Meridien Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
🇺🇸Watertown, Massachusetts, United States
Beyer Research
🇺🇸Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Remedica LLC
🇺🇸Rochester, Michigan, United States
Mid Hudson Medical Research, PLLC
🇺🇸New Windsor, New York, United States
American Health Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Medication Management, LLC
🇺🇸Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley, PC
🇺🇸Poughkeepsie, New York, United States
PMG Research of Raleigh, LLC
🇺🇸Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Peters Medical Research
🇺🇸High Point, North Carolina, United States
Clinical Research Associates of Tidewater, an AMR company
🇺🇸Norfolk, Virginia, United States
ULB Hopital Erasme
🇧🇪Bruxelles, Belgium
UZ Leuven
🇧🇪Leuven, Belgium
AZ Groeninge - Campus Vercruysselaan
🇧🇪Kortrijk, Belgium
DIEX Recherche Victoriaville Inc.
🇨🇦Victoriaville, Canada
Krajska nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
🇨🇿Liberec, Czechia
Thomayerova nemocnice, PARENT
🇨🇿Praha, Czechia
Urocentrum Plzen
🇨🇿Plzen, Czechia
Gemeinschaftspraxis fuer Urologie und Andrologie
🇩🇪Duisburg, Germany
Jahn Ferenc Del-pesti Korhaz es Rendelointezet
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
NECCR Primacare Research, LLC
🇺🇸Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Bayside Clinical Research LLC
🇺🇸New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Clinique Médicale St-Louis (Recherche) inc d/b/a/ Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
🇨🇦Québec, Canada
PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
🇺🇸Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Hetenyi Geza Korhaz-Rendelointezet
🇭🇺Szolnok, Hungary
Coastal Carolina Research Center, Inc
🇺🇸Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Bluewater Health-Norman Site
🇨🇦Sarnia, Canada
Urologie Benešov - Afimed s.r.o.
🇨🇿Benešov, Czechia
Klinikum Weiden, Klinik f. Urologie, Andrologie und Kinderurologie
🇩🇪Weiden, Germany
Nasz Lekarz Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
🇵🇱Bydgoszcz, Poland