MedPath

Snack It Up for Parents: Interventions to Improve Children's Snacks

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Snacking
Interventions
Behavioral: Education
Behavioral: Combined
Behavioral: Incentive
Registration Number
NCT03678779
Lead Sponsor
Tufts University
Brief Summary

Influencing children's snacking habits has the potential to reap long-term rewards, yet few studies have focused on helping parents to provide healthier snacks for their children. The study tested the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of parent interventions to improve snacks for children ages 8-12.

Detailed Description

Objective. Influencing children's snacking habits has the potential to reap long-term rewards, yet few studies have focused on helping parents to provide healthier snacks for their children. The study tested the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of parent interventions to improve snacks for children ages 8-12.

Methods. Parents of children enrolled in an out-of-school-time soccer program in a low-income school district (n 16) were recruited. A comparison of 3 randomly-assigned interventions was conducted: 4 parents received grocery store gift cards (Incentive); 7 received nutrition education videos with tip sheets (Education); and 5 received both (Combined). The interventions were assessed qualitatively by interviewing parents and quantitatively to determine motivation (psychosocial survey) and children's snack quality (web-based 24-hour recall).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
17
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 year and older
  • Must have a child enrolled in one of three designated soccer sites of the study and must agree to let their child take the online 24 hour recall (ASA24)
  • Must have a child 7 years or older participating on a soccer team
  • Must frequently buy groceries from Stop & Shop (only if recruited for a study arms that involves grocery coupons)
  • Must be literate in English or Spanish.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Failure to provide informed consent
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EducationEducationParents received brief weekly nutrition education videos (approximately one minute in length, uploaded on YouTube and viewable on most operating systems and on mobile devices
CombinedCombinedParents received both the Incentive and Education arm interventions
IncentiveIncentiveEach week parents received one $5 grocery store gift card per child in the household, intended for the purchase of healthy snacks, donated to the study by a partnering grocery store
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
snack quality by on-line 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24)6 weeks

grams of sugar, fruits and vegetables as snacks

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Self-efficacy by questions adapted NCI Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey6 weeks

Parent self-efficacy for providing fruit and vegetable snacks; questions adapted from the self-efficacy questions in the National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey (Erinosho, T. O., Pinard, C. A., Nebeling, L. C., Moser, R. P., Shaikh, A. R., Resnicow, K., . . . Yaroch, A. L. (2015). Development and implementation of the National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey to assess correlates of fruit and vegetable intake in adults. PLoS One, 10(2), e0115017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115017)

Intrinsic motivation by adapted Intrinsic Motivation Inventory6 weeks

Parent intrinsic motivation for providing fruit and vegetable snacks; questions adapted from the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (McAuley, E., Duncan, T., \& Tammen, V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58).

Decisional balance by the Mainvil Decisional Balance Scale6 weeks

Parent pros and cons for providing fruit and vegetable snacks to children; questions adapted from Mainvil decisional balance scale (Mainvil, L. A., Lawson, R., Horwath, C. C., McKenzie, J. E., \& Hart, I. (2010). Validated scales to assess adult decisional balance to eat more fruits and vegetables. Appetite, 55(3), 454-465. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.007)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath