MedPath

A Prospective Multicenter RCT Study of Deep Jugular Lymphovenous Anastomosis in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease
Interventions
Procedure: Deep cervical lymphatic-venous anastomosis
Drug: Donepezil drug treatment
Registration Number
NCT07060391
Lead Sponsor
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Brief Summary

This research aims to observe the efficacy and safety of surgery compared with traditional medical treatment for moderate to severe dementia in Alzheimer's disease. This is a prospective multicenter RCT clinical research, involving a total of 3 research centers.Patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease accompanied by moderate to severe cognitive dysfunction in these three hospitals from January 2025 to January 2027 were included. This research is expected to recruit a total of 186 patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.93patients received conventional medical treatment, Deep cervical lymphatic-venous anastomosis was performed in 93 patients.Comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the patients within 48 weeks after treatment.

Detailed Description

Alzheimer's disease is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system characterized by progressive cognitive dysfunction and behavioral impairment. At present, the treatment strategies for Alzheimer's disease include drug therapy, non-drug therapy and some emerging treatment methods. However, clinical evidence has confirmed that the effects of these treatment measures are limited. In recent years, Some neurosurgeons in China have begun to attempt to improve the disease progression of severe Alzheimer's disease through the innovative microscopic surgical method of deep jugular lymphovenous anastomosis. The therapeutic principle is Lymph node reconstruction is carried out using microsurgical techniques to improve the lymphatic circulation and return of the brain, accelerate the excretion of pathological proteins, the metabolic products of the brain, thereby delaying the degenerative changes of the brain and the progression of Alzheimer's disease. To verify the above assumption, this study will collaborate with a total of three institutions, namely Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch and Wuxi Branch. It is estimated that 186 patients with moderate to severe dementia of Alzheimer's disease will be included. They were randomly divided into the surgical treatment group (93 cases) and the traditional medical treatment group (93 cases). Cognitive function assessment, PETMR imaging examination, cerebrospinal fluid/blood testing and quality-adjusted life years were analyzed respectively at the 1st week, 4th week, 12th week, 24th week and 48th week after conservative treatment or surgery. To observe the efficacy and safety of surgery compared with traditional medical treatment for moderate to severe dementia in Alzheimer's disease.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
186
Inclusion Criteria
  1. The patient was clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and had a moderate to severe cognitive function score.
  2. Age: 30-80 years old.
  3. Gender is not limited.
  4. The patient or their family members authorize their willingness to participate in this clinical trial and sign the informed consent form.
  5. no contraindications for surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. A history of radiotherapy or surgery for the head and neck.
  2. Patients or their families with poor compliance who cannot strictly follow the rules.
  3. Patients who cannot tolerate surgery.
  4. Patients with other diseases that affect cognitive function.
  5. Patients who cannot tolerate donepezil drug treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Surgical treatmentDeep cervical lymphatic-venous anastomosisDeep cervical lymphatic-venous anastomosis
Internal medicine conservative treatmentDonepezil drug treatmentDonepezil drug ,5-10mg,qd,po. All patients stopped taking cognitive-enhancing drugs and marketed therapeutic drugs such as ginkgo, high-dose vitamin E, lecithin, estrogen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Memegan, etc. after enrollment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ADAS-cog scorebaseline,48 weeks

The improvement of 4 points by ADAS-cog is used as the judgment criterion for the clinical therapeutic effect, Compare the remission rates between the experimental group (surgery) and the control group (medication).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Imaging dataFrom the first week to the 48th week

PET-MRI labeled with specific tracers shows the changes in amyloid protein or tau deposition, Quantify and statistically analyze the changes between the two groups.

Cerebrospinal fluid examinationFrom the first week to the 48th week

Test the Alzheimer's disease markers such as amyloid protein or tau deposition in the cerebrospinal fluid between the two groups, count the changes between the two groups.

Markers of Alzheimer's disease in the bloodFrom the first week to the 48th week

Test the changes of Alzheimer's disease markers such as amyloid protein in the blood between the two groups,count the changes between the two groups.

Surgery-related adverse reactionsFrom the first week to the 48th week

The occurrence of complications:such as postoperative bleeding,Peripheral nerve injury,Lymphatic vessel leakage,Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, etc.

Quality-Adjusted Life YearFrom the first week to the 48th week

It is a health outcome evaluation index that comprehensively considers survival time and quality of life. The survival time and quality of life of the intervention group and the medication group were compared. The calculation method is Survival Time (years) × Health Utility Value, The health utility value is a quality weight reflecting a specific health status(1 indicates complete health, 0 indicates death, and a negative value indicates a state worse than death). The utility values of patients under different health conditions were evaluated through the Quality of life assessment scale, an assessment should be conducted every six months after treatment. Multiply the duration of each health state by the corresponding utility value. Then accumulate to obtain the Quality-Adjusted Life Year score.

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.