Radial Reload Laparoscopic LAR Case Series
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Device: Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology
- Registration Number
- NCT01706822
- Lead Sponsor
- Medtronic - MITG
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the Radial Reload Stapler during laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) or anterior proctosigmoidectomy for rectal cancer by assessing the primary and secondary endpoints.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 8
- The subject is able to understand and sign Informed Consent Form.
- The subject is between 18-85 years of age.
- The subject is anticipated to undergo a resection of the rectum with anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection.
- The subject is anticipated to undergo mobilization and stapling of the rectum laparoscopically.
- Any female patient, who is pregnant, suspected pregnant, or nursing.
- The participant is unable or unwilling to comply with the study requirements, follow-up schedule.
- The participant has co-morbidities which, in the opinion of the investigator, will not be appropriate for the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology Covidien Radial Reload Stapler with Tri-Staple Technology in laparoscopic LAR or proctosigmoidectomy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Surgeon's Ability to Achieve a Staple Line at the Desired Level of the Rectum. The Reported Value Represents the Number of Participants in Whom the Criteria Was Met Operative The surgeon's ability to achieve a staple line at the desired level of the rectum.
The Ability to Achieve Adequate Distal Margins (Defined as >2cm [or >1cm With Clear Histologic Evaluation]) in the Low Rectum. The Reported Value Represents the Number of Participants in Whom the Criteria Was Met Operative The ability to achieve adequate distal margins (defined as \>2cm \[or \>1cm with clear histologic evaluation\]) in the low rectum.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Access Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree Operatively 1. Access measured by surgeon usability questionnaire.
Maneuverability Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree Operatively 3. Maneuverability measured by surgeon usability questionnaire Question: Maneuverability of Radial reload during the procedure was adequate
Visibility Measured by Surgeon Usability Questionnaire. The Reported Values Represent Percentage of Cases Surgeon Agree/Strongly Agree Operatively 2. Visibility measured by surgeon usability questionnaire
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States