MedPath

Nasal Swab studyComparison of Effectiveness of Povidone-iodine Versus Saline Versus 3M Skin and Nasal Antiseptic 5% Povidone-Iodine USP Swabs for Decolonizing Intranasal MSSA/MRSA

Not Applicable
Conditions
MRSA/ MSSA Colonization of the Nares
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02652325
Lead Sponsor
Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
Brief Summary

To determine if routinely available 10% povidone-iodine swabs are more effective than saline and 3M Skin and Nasal Antiseptic 5% Povidone-Iodine USP for decolonizing MRSA.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  1. All potential total hip and total knee arthroplasty candidates
  2. All femoroacetabular osteoplasty patients
  3. All pelvic acetabular osteotomy patients
  4. All core decompression patients
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Any trauma patients
  2. Any tumor patients
  3. Any patient with periprosthetic joint infection
  4. Any patient with surgical site infection
  5. Any patient with known MRSA infection
  6. Any patients allergic to povidone-iodine
  7. Patients with thyroid disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
3M Skin and Nasal Antiseptic 5% Povidone-Iodine USP swabs5% Povidone-Iodine USP swabs-
SalineSaline-
povidone-iodinePovidone-Iodine-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MSSA/MRSA colonization as tested by PCR24 hours

Subjects will undergo a swab of their nares to undergo PCR analysis to determine if they are effectively decolonized four hours after initial treatment

MSSA/MRSA colonization in the nares4 hours

Subjects will undergo a swab of their nares to undergo PCR analysis to determine if they are effectively decolonized four hours after initial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath