Miller vs Macintosh size 0 and 1 blades for tracheal intubation of infants under 6 months: a randomized comparative study

Completed

• Conditions: AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; ANAESTHESIA; Anaesthesiology - Other anaesthesiology

• Registration Number: ACTRN12619000151134
• Lead Sponsor: Kemal Tolga Saracoglu

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Completion: 2017-06-26
• Study Start: 2019-02-01
• Last Update Posted: 15 July 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

ASA I or II patients
Children under 6 months
Children undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

Children with a history of a difficult airway
Children with diagnosed congenital syndrome,
Infants less than 37 weeks gestational age at birth,
Children with acute or chronic pulmonary or neuromuscular diseases

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Primary outcome of this study is to compare Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores of Miller and Machintosh blades.[At min 0 after direct laryngoscopy]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
the time between two laryngeal views via chronometer[at min 0 after direct laryngoscopy];time between rocuronium administration and tracheal intubation via chronometer[at min 0 after direct laryngoscopy];the time between tracheal intubation and second visualization via chronometer[at min 0 after second visualization]